Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
It cannot be denied that every individual is unique in their own way. After all we are the identified on the basis of our idiosyncrasies and likeliness. However, some of us are truly born with a gift that makes them stand out and shine in their own light. These are the ones truly considered peculiar since these do not fit within the norms of society. Societies should identify these children and train them to develop their talents. But there is always a chance that these might imperil their chance to a normal life that they might want to lead. Reflecting upon the following examples, one can comprehend the difficulties that these children go through.
Let’s take an example of a kid who is extremely good at Math and solves 10th grade problems while only being in the 2nd Grade. The other class mates might get jealous of him because of him being too smart and working wonders like these which in turn lead him to having no friends at all. There great misconception about people who are studious is that they are called “Nerds and Geeks” and that they like being isolated. This may be true in some cases but still these are humans and humans like company. Also, if these kids are identified at an early age, there could be a chance that governments and nations could misuse their special talents endangering theirs as well as the lives of others associated with them.
But, not all goes to hell like this some gifted children emerge to be brilliant miracle workers. One can look at an example of Ayan Qureshi, a computer genius, who is so consummate that he passed the tech’s giant exam only when he was 5 years old and got certified as Microsoft Professional. He is renowned to be the youngest computer specialist in the world. His talents were recognized by the society and he now has a network of computers at his home.
To conclude, like everything has its pros and cons, being recognized at an early age as a genius has it too. Therefore, I think that gifted children should be trained when they understand what they are and can do and be able to contemplate the nitty-gritties of the life the will embark upon.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, after all, i think, as well as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66315789474 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55797054252 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568421052632 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8185952451 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4444444444 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18911206371 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627044618791 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798472198578 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109033971562 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307961906938 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.