Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the m

Essay topics:

Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

Will the earth ever retain balance of the wilderness and forestry that has been cut down and commercialized? Will there ever be the same type of freshness in the world? Most, if not all, of us would say no. This is simply because of the commercial culture that has prevailed throughout the globe. Many countries have shed their forests and the wildlife with it because of the construction practices and the business mindedness of their practitioners. However, there is a flip side to it. The anthropogenic activity increase in the wilderness areas has become the dire requirement of the nations to incorporate the burgeoning populace throughout the world. There was a study that indicated that our planet can only sustain 1 billion people but the number has soared to 7 billion and is escalating by the day. But there should be a check and balance to preserve the nature because the more we are endangering it the more we are at danger.

Global warming has been the most common conversational phenomena these days. People talk about it in and out and it heard over and over. Yet, there is no one taking measures to do anything about it. This global warming is the cause of rise in the planetary temperature by 3’C to 7’C and has imperiled both marine and terrestrial species and that is the result of all human activities, burning of fossil fuels, construction activities, deforestation and many more. It is the luxuries and needs of humans that have caused the disruption in nature and it is we, the humans that need to overcome this calamity.

Recently, there are some laws passed to ensure safer and healthier environmental practices. Going Green as the campaign said and people are starting to realize the dire consequences of this grave situation. However, more efforts are needed to educate people and create awareness about this particular problem. There also have been laws for sustainable construction practices and there are these technologies put in place to ensure minimum wastage and energy efficiency. But there are very little percentage of people and organizations that follow these codes and regulations. The WHO and Environmental Protection agencies should enforce strict regulations and also the wilderness should be disturbed to a minimum so that the imbalance is restored. It is mostly due to Construction Activities that wilderness and forests are removed and the area is cleared to erect structures. Governments should pass treatise for construction companies and builders to practice sustainable methods and reduce the land occupancy to a certain number.

By my reckoning, I believe that although the pollution and imbalances are caused by human activities, it is not entirely their fault. Since the population is rising ever day, there needs to land to accommodate this increase. However, in situations where humans can make some effort and reduce the carbon footprint, they should exercise it to the fullest.

Votes
Average: 5.4 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 33.0 14.8657303371 222% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2474.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 482.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13278008299 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92109699098 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51244813278 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 790.2 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.6531104672 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.96 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.28 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.04 5.21951772744 20% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101790182176 0.243740707755 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0251862082375 0.0831039109588 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299110040639 0.0758088955206 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0562264548402 0.150359130593 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386226809045 0.0667264976115 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.