The business manager argues that the loss of advertising contracts and peoples' complains coverage is because of the less time they give to weather and local news and in order to restore that they should devote more time to those is spurious because the groundwork on which the argument is based is unsubstantiated.
Firstly, it is surmised that over the past year the late-night news program has devoted more time to national news and less time to weather and local news and that is sole the reason people have been complaining about. However, there may be various reasons to it. First, the channel has been covering the local news and weather sufficiently low overall and not just in the late night news program. Second, that whatever amount the channel broadcasted of the weather and local news was unpalatable and unauthentic and hence the complains. Also, do the viewers complain about coverage only in the late-night program or throughout the day is not specified. The failure of writer to acknowledge these facts calls into question the veracity of this claim.
Secondly, the television station has lost the advertising contracts from local business during the late-night news program. The writer posits that it is because they broadcast more national news in that program. It might be because the overall viewership may have declined over the past year. In addition, the local business may not be profiting at all from the advertisements and might not be able to pay the television station anymore. The writer does not provide us with any information if the local busisness is still proliferating or in loss or has shut down altogether. Since, these assertions lack information that could validate them, the claim renders itself specious.
Finally, even if the news channel devotes more time to the local news and weather, there is no guarantee that it would restore its revenues from the advertising companies. The author draws a correlation between the two but fails to authenticate these assumptions. Had there been provided any data that there is a possibility of reclaiming the revenues by transmitting more weather and local news, the claim would have been more sound.
Thus, the conclusion that in order to attract more viewers to the program and avoid losing any further advertising revenues, the channel should restore the time devoted to weather and local news to its former level fails to make a cogent case and is unjustified.
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: The writer does not provide us with any information if the local busisness is still proliferating or in loss or has shut down altogether.
Error: busisness Suggestion: business
----------------
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- OK
----------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 405 350
No. of Characters: 2006 1500
No. of Different Words: 182 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.486 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.953 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.638 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 132 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 114 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 67 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 43 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.824 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.739 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.706 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.345 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.546 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.088 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d local news and that is sole the reason people have been complaining about. Howe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 11.1786427146 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 55.5748502994 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2055.0 2260.96107784 91% => OK
No of words: 405.0 441.139720559 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07407407407 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7078507009 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 204.123752495 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464197530864 0.468620217663 99% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 705.55239521 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.76447105788 137% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.690474411 57.8364921388 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.882352941 119.503703932 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8235294118 23.324526521 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 5.70786347227 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383584600686 0.218282227539 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125838925324 0.0743258471296 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11556029132 0.0701772020484 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222531096791 0.128457276422 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789112479601 0.0628817314937 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.3799401198 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.3550499002 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 98.500998004 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 12.3882235529 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.