Should a person be barred from exercising his or her civil rights because he or she has knowningly committed a crime is a question with refutable answers. Many of us would condemn someone like this and do say yes in the answer to the question. However, there may be some who would look at it differently and say no in response to that question. I, on the other hand, believe that it actually depends upon the extent and severity of the crime. To illuminate if a person should or should not be allowed to retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labour, one could reflect on the following scenarios in which a person commits a crime.
Taking an example of a person, who for his family, violated the law by theft of some money or other goods beacuse he could not afford them. During the period of worldwide recession, there were many cases reported like that and it was because of the facts that a lot of people lost their jobs and were unable to support their families, like they used to and just because they could not have failed in front of their family and wanted to fulfill their needs and desires, was the sole reason that they knowongly contravened. The only thing that drove them on the verge of going outside the law was their insufficiency to be able to support their families. In this case, the conundrum arises of the persons culpability and the degree of his indictment.
In contrast, could be taken a person who,is transgresses because he gets a kick in it. His mental capabilities allow him to disregard all the laws and regulations and he likes committing crimes. Like there was a recent report of a person that shot people in Miami, Florida based on their ethnicity and sexual preference. This kind of mentality should be reprimanded and delinquents mired in these crimes should be indicted with severe punishments.
So, by my reckoning, the cognitive state and circumstances in which a person knowingly infringes a law and b, really matters and the extent of their crime also matters in order to truly justify if the errant should or should not be able to retain his or her rights.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 696, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... this case, the conundrum arises of the persons culpability and the degree of his indic...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , is
...In contrast, could be taken a person who,is transgresses because he gets a kick in ...
^^^
Line 7, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by my reckoning, the cognitive state and circumstances in which a person knowingl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, look, may, really, so, in contrast, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 381.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60367454068 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54062276236 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522309711286 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.6344738145 60.3974514979 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.285714286 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2142857143 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29827354498 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106127674799 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142427165886 0.0758088955206 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186797318431 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137762466745 0.0667264976115 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 48.8420337079 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.