Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
This topic raises a controversial issue whether higher authorities should provide free education for destitute students or not. However, providing full aids like fee waivers beneficial for them. But, as per my perspective government should provide extra benefits to them. I firmly believe that, bureaucracy should not provide free education to anyone. I will support my claims with help of following example that I will describe in upcoming paragraph.
First and foremost, the government should encourage to destitute child towards higher studies by providing scholarships based on their previous results. Hence, they do the work-hard and try to make their future auspicious. Also, universities should provide extra loan services for students with minimum amount of interest. So, they get a chance to learn advanced subjects and they will become successful. Apart from this, taking huge amount of loan motivates students to put their last bit effort in order to achieve their goal. Therefore, top council must provide loan services and scholarships rather than full waives of tution.
Secondly, universities provide wages to their staff from the fees of the student. So, free education may be burden financially for universities. Apart from that, many schools promote the research education, where significant amount of money required. Hence, if students have no more money then they have to sacrifice a great experience of research studies and it is maybe worthless. That's why every higher school must take some amount of money from their students regardless of their financial status. For example, in USA most universities provide minimal amount of scholarship to the every students rather than provide full waive of to the particular students. Hence, all students get equal chance to get scholarships and they galvanized towards their goal.
Admittedly, the government must provide free tution to some students in special case. If they are best in that particular field and they are able to provide benefits to the universities. Likewise, in India manu colleges provide free education to those pupils, they have excellent abilities in soprts and due to that particular university always wins the championship. Hence, in special abilities of prodigy must be accolade by the government.
To conclude, I re-affirm that school should not provide free education. Because of in cutthroat competition in education sphere, money is an indispensable commodity and due to that many problems arise related to money. But, again universities should consider all factors to take account before giving free education to any student.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 632, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hips rather than full waives of tution. Secondly, universities provide wages to ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 290, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
.... Hence, if students have no more money then they have to sacrifice a great experien...
^^^^
Line 9, column 384, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...arch studies and it is maybe worthless. Thats why every higher school must take some ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, likewise, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, apart from, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2234.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 407.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48894348894 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81525953336 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520884520885 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0711699168 60.3974514979 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.36 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.28 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150551707176 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512084506693 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500794163335 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100771366592 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298995835572 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.