Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men and women into space. Therefore, we should invest our resources in unmanned space flight.
In this argument , the arguer suggests to prioritize unmanned space flight over manned space flight. To justify this claim, he states that manned space flight is costly and is prone to serious accidents. He also assumes that a great deal of information can be achieved without the costs and risks associated with sending men and women into space based on the premise that a number of unmanned space probes and satellites have been launched succesfully. However, a deep analysis on this argument reveals that this argument does not seem convincing.
First of all , the arguer highlights the fact that manned space flight is costly and dangerous but what if the organisation recruits the skilled personnel in order to rectify the mistake that led to the unfortunate situations. Perhaps , the concerned organisation may be planning to change the morphology of the space probes or remove the other particular hindrances which were responsible for the dangerous situations.
Secondly, the arguer has assumed that the grave mistakes ,which could have been done by the person in control of the space probe, will be repeated in future. I dont think this sounds too convincing to incline over his suggestion. When a mistake of such magnitude is committed , the culprit will want to become self-aware . He wants to see where his mistake came from and wants to indulge in a solution . Even if the person does get noticed of it , the higher authority will surely want to replace him with more skill and knowledge.
Thus, the arguer, though he has stated a seemingly cogent assumption , should consider the aforementioned questions and answer it flawlessly in order to make his assumption convincing.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 276 350
No. of Characters: 1376 1500
No. of Different Words: 159 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.076 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.986 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.643 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 103 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 72 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 51 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.174 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.583 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.347 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.586 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.142 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
In this argument , the arguer suggests to prioritize unman...
^^
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggests prioritizing'.
Suggestion: suggests prioritizing
In this argument , the arguer suggests to prioritize unmanned space flight over manned space...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ght over manned space flight. To justify this claim, he states that manned space...
^^
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...light. To justify this claim, he states that manned space flight is costly and i...
^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s not seem convincing. First of all , the arguer highlights the fact that man...
^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d to the unfortunate situations. Perhaps , the concerned organisation may be plann...
^^
Line 9, column 57, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...guer has assumed that the grave mistakes ,which could have been done by the person...
^^
Line 9, column 148, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ol of the space probe, will be repeated in future. I dont think this sounds too convincin...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 161, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ce probe, will be repeated in future. I dont think this sounds too convincing to inc...
^^^^
Line 9, column 199, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'inclining'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'convince' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: inclining
...I dont think this sounds too convincing to incline over his suggestion. When a mistake of ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 276, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...a mistake of such magnitude is committed , the culprit will want to become self-aw...
^^
Line 9, column 321, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e culprit will want to become self-aware . He wants to see where his mistake came ...
^^
Line 9, column 402, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... from and wants to indulge in a solution . Even if the person does get noticed of ...
^^
Line 9, column 446, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ven if the person does get noticed of it , the higher authority will surely want t...
^^
Line 13, column 69, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...has stated a seemingly cogent assumption , should consider the aforementioned ques...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.6327345309 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 55.5748502994 63% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 2260.96107784 63% => OK
No of words: 276.0 441.139720559 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14130434783 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.56307096286 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76021079597 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 204.123752495 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.468620217663 125% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 705.55239521 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 19.7664670659 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6143187257 57.8364921388 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 119.503703932 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.324526521 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.70786347227 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 15.0 5.25449101796 285% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300209728062 0.218282227539 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100994125773 0.0743258471296 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133101176512 0.0701772020484 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151742679022 0.128457276422 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157896023643 0.0628817314937 251% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.3550499002 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.5979740519 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.32208582834 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 98.500998004 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.