Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Saving the lives of people and improving their immunity is a goal towards which all the administrations are working. When a disease spreads out in an area which has not been previoulsy encountered, people are unsure on how to react and the authorities are also contemplating on which measures to deploy so as to achieve minimum infection from the disease and if possible, eradicate it completly.
Cow flu is a disease which if encoutered, can prove fatal. There have been multiple options to develop a vaccine which will increase the immunity of the people and help them with first, not contacting the disease and second, if contacted fight the disease and emerge victorious. The research and development process of a vaccine is a very tricky procedure and if not done properly has the potential to increase the spread of the disease rather than culminate it.
For a vaccine, scientists inject a healthy person with a weakend sample of the pathogen which causes the disease. The weak nature of the pathogen allows the body to produce anti-bodies to defeat the pathogen and hence, it equips body to fight the same pathogen again if the person injected is affected by the disease. But before we reach the human trials, there is step where the vaccine is administered in animals to check their response and the defense they would present if contacted by the same pathogen. The animal trials determine whether the vaccine will progress to human trials or not. Even in human trials, the vaccine needs to be administered to a wide range of people across different age groups and having different genetic configuration in them. This helps the scientists as it gives them the probable response which people might generate and also to improve the vaccine by giving it some tweaks if required.
After all this research and development, there still a chance that the vaccine may lead to improper response against the actual disease or aggravate its effect on the body as each and every person is different and their responses will definetly vary when contacted with the disease, this is the reason the producers also add drugs to quell the symptoms which might rise in majority of population when they are administered with the vaccine some common symtoms can include fever, which is a sign that the body is fighting against the foreign object injected by the vaccine.
Even after all the precautions which are taken by the authorities there always lies a chance that people might die when they are administered with the vaccine, these include people who have a weak immunity system like people with underlaying problems like heart disease or diabetes or aged people. If the vaccine is administered repeatedly the count of such people can increase and force the administration to stop the inocultion program. The severity of the disease and efficiency of the vaccine are the pivotal factors in the decision of the authorities to cancel or continue with the inoculation.
To conclude, the death of people due to vaccine administration should be weighed against the deaths occurred due to contacting the disease which is cow flu in the given case. The administration should consider the loss of few for gain of many if the situation becomes very severe and may lead to a partial/complete devastation of the livelihood of people and their health, the call should taken to prevents maximum damage and keep as much people healthy as possible.
Comments
e-rater score report
Out of topic
----------------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 7 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 12 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 577 350
No. of Characters: 2813 1500
No. of Different Words: 256 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.901 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.875 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.646 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 213 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 154 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 95 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 53 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 32.056 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 17.245 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.611 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.361 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.61 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.187 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ntemplating on which measures to deploy so as to achieve minimum infection from the dise...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 424, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...t completly. Cow flu is a disease which if encoutered, can prove fatal. There have...
^^
Line 1, column 3345, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have taken' or 'take'?
Suggestion: have taken; take
...eople and their health, the call should taken to prevents maximum damage and keep as ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 3354, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'prevent'.
Suggestion: prevent
... their health, the call should taken to prevents maximum damage and keep as much people ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 3390, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... to prevents maximum damage and keep as much people healthy as possible.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, still, after all, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 11.1786427146 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 20.0 13.6137724551 147% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 55.5748502994 130% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2846.0 2260.96107784 126% => OK
No of words: 576.0 441.139720559 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94097222222 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89897948557 4.56307096286 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73543905663 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 204.123752495 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447916666667 0.468620217663 96% => OK
syllable_count: 918.0 705.55239521 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 22.8473053892 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 113.64173048 57.8364921388 196% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.411764706 119.503703932 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8823529412 23.324526521 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05882352941 5.70786347227 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 5.15768463074 19% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182005956121 0.218282227539 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634479426081 0.0743258471296 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351982833051 0.0701772020484 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182005956121 0.128457276422 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0628817314937 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 14.3799401198 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 48.3550499002 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.197005988 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.5979740519 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 98.500998004 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.1389221557 136% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.