The argument presented here definitely needs to be reevaluated. There are certain possibilities which the argument dosen't consider. In the following passage, we will discuss how the argument can be reevaluated and discuss cases on which it shold have considered to present a particular conclusion.
The argument suggest that there is a "small" possibility that a person will die as a result of inoculation. The previous statement states nothing about how deadly is the cow flu to a infected person. The argument can be divided into two possible cases. First one being that, the probability of a person dying after getting infected by a cow flu is much higher than the probability of a person dying after inoculation. Which simply means the cw flu is a deadly virus. In this case the the permit to inoculation will be beneficial. This will help to save lives of more people..
The other case might that the cow flu is less prone to be spread. This might very well explain the argument presented in the essay. This might help save lives because the inoculation might kill people even if in future they would have not gotten the virus or luckily more better options for the inoculations or tratment have been discovered to fight againt cow flu.
Therefore, before conculding any arguement it should be well examined. The passage present the cases in which the above argument would strenghen its stand or weaken its. stand considereing the previous statement limited inforamation. This might very well be confirmed from the cases of COVID. It was dessiminating amongst the people very rapidly and rate of person dying after getting affected was aslo too high. So, inoculation became necessary. But in this case the the inoculatoin itself is killing people and if the if it is not as prone to infecting other people as COVID was it might not be beniicial to provide an inocualtion of cow flu.
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 322 350
No. of Characters: 1537 1500
No. of Different Words: 158 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.236 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.773 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.662 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 100 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 73 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 52 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.947 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.118 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.421 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.303 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.474 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.06 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
... particular conclusion. The argument suggest that there is a 'small' possi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
.... The argument suggest that there is a 'small' possibility that a pe...
^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...hing about how deadly is the cow flu to a infected person. The argument can be di...
^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ly is the cow flu to a infected person. The argument can be divided into two possib...
^^^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ty of a person dying after inoculation. Which simply means the cw flu is a deadly vir...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... cw flu is a deadly virus. In this case the the permit to inoculation will be beneficia...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... cw flu is a deadly virus. In this case the the permit to inoculation will be beneficia...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 584, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...s will help to save lives of more people.. The other case might that the cow fl...
^^
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...ld have not gotten the virus or luckily more better options for the inoculations or tratmen...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Stand
...ould strenghen its stand or weaken its. stand considereing the previous statement lim...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 465, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...tion became necessary. But in this case the the inoculatoin itself is killing people an...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 465, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...tion became necessary. But in this case the the inoculatoin itself is killing people an...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 521, Rule ID: IF_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...oin itself is killing people and if the if it is not as prone to infecting other p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, well, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 55.5748502994 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 2260.96107784 70% => OK
No of words: 321.0 441.139720559 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94080996885 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81296853794 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 204.123752495 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504672897196 0.468620217663 108% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 705.55239521 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.9813625245 57.8364921388 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.3 119.503703932 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.05 23.324526521 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.70786347227 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 13.0 5.25449101796 247% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 6.88822355289 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274741014697 0.218282227539 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082294371645 0.0743258471296 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540744430817 0.0701772020484 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170349569611 0.128457276422 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717434954643 0.0628817314937 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.3799401198 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.3550499002 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.5979740519 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 98.500998004 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.