Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i

The given memorandum states that even though lots of lives could be saved if regular inoculations against cow flu were administered, due to the chance that a person might die from the inoculation itself, these inoculations are not administered regularly. However, the author has not given us any clear stats regarding his argument.
First of all, inoculation of most diseases contain dead or weakened form of the microorganisms causing that disease. Thus, the possibility of dying from them is much low as compared to the real diseases. If this is the same with cow flu, isn't it less riskier to let people be administered with the inoculation than leave them to be exposed without any protection? Even if there was a risk, especially in already infected areas, isn't it better to take the risk and have at-least a greater chance of survival instead?
Secondly the author fails to mention how infectious cow flu actually is. If it is as infectious as Covid-19 or bird flu, it would be much more imminent to inoculate everyone if one person in the vicinity is infected. However, if it is less infectious like the HIV virus for example, where spread of the disease can be contained more easily, inoculating everyone with even a small risk would not make much sense since it can be contained easily.
Further, one should also consider - how easily can the disease be identified once a person is infected? If it is not identifiable until the later stages, then inoculating people in infected areas would be much more important to save as many lives as possible. Lastly one should consider, what are the actual statistics regarding the risk from the inoculations, as compared to the fatality rate of the disease? Have more percent of people died during the trial runs of the inoculations than people who were actually infected?
In conclusion, there are a lot of statistical data and information about the disease itself which have not been provided to us. Whether people should be inoculated despite the risk or can more people be saved without the inoculations - this argument is dependant on a lot of other data that are missing and thus, coming to a solid conclusion regarding the conjecture given is not possible with just this information.

Votes
Average: 6.8 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 238, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ases. If this is the same with cow flu, isnt it less riskier to let people be admini...
^^^^
Line 2, column 246, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less risky'?
Suggestion: less risky
... this is the same with cow flu, isnt it less riskier to let people be administered with the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 428, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
..., especially in already infected areas, isnt it better to take the risk and have at-...
^^^^
Line 2, column 436, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'betters', 'wells'?
Suggestion: betters; wells
...ally in already infected areas, isnt it better to take the risk and have at-least a gr...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
...out the inoculations - this argument is dependant on a lot of other data that are missing...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, lastly, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, in conclusion, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.6327345309 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 2260.96107784 82% => OK
No of words: 379.0 441.139720559 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91292875989 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7986560462 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 204.123752495 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514511873351 0.468620217663 110% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 705.55239521 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4990514832 57.8364921388 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.133333333 119.503703932 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2666666667 23.324526521 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 5.70786347227 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348450239583 0.218282227539 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110423678753 0.0743258471296 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088753345979 0.0701772020484 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197148886469 0.128457276422 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047785728912 0.0628817314937 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.3550499002 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.5979740519 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 98.500998004 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 7 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 8 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 381 350
No. of Characters: 1819 1500
No. of Different Words: 181 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.418 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.774 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.725 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 123 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 93 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 68 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 40 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.236 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 1 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.336 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.336 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.122 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5