Big multinational companies often depend upon experienced consultants to guide them towards operating more efficiently. The given conjecture states though, that, if these companies listened more to their own employees instead, such consultants would be unnecessary. However, while listening to opinions of their own employees is important, in my opinion, it would be more more beneficial to consult outside professionals. Let me explain why.
First of all, outside consultants would give a different perspective to the company's problems. Since the employees have a real stake in the issue as it concerns them first-hand, they might be shortsighted or look for their own gains instead of the company as a whole. Thus, they might not be fully objective unlike a neutral outsider who can identify the exact problem more objectively.
Secondly, these outside consultants are more qualified to identify and solve issues regarding the efficiency of the company. A developer or accountant working in one of the branches might be an expert in their domain, but when it comes to managerial issues concerning the efficacy of the company, a qualified MBA graduate would be a much preferred choice for obvious reasons.
Thirdly, if the company directly listens to complaints from employees, there might be complaints when the problems pertaining to a particular department or employee gets attended faster as compared to others. This could create feelings of jealousy or dissatisfaction among employees that would be more derogatory for the company's efficiency.
In conclusion, even though employees should be able to list out their issues and have forums etc. for confessing the problems they face, it should be qualified third-party consultants who should be called in to take the finalised action and decide how to run the company more efficiently.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: more
...s important, in my opinion, it would be more more beneficial to consult outside professio...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'more' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: more
...s important, in my opinion, it would be more more beneficial to consult outside professio...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...rtment or employee gets attended faster as compared to others. This could create f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, while, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 288.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40277777778 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04679932242 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579861111111 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7110040865 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.692307692 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 5.21951772744 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.479380295371 0.243740707755 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178908046735 0.0831039109588 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103239287867 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266801317691 0.150359130593 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112523289622 0.0667264976115 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: more
...s important, in my opinion, it would be more more beneficial to consult outside professio...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'more' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: more
...s important, in my opinion, it would be more more beneficial to consult outside professio...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...rtment or employee gets attended faster as compared to others. This could create f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, while, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 288.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40277777778 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04679932242 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579861111111 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7110040865 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.692307692 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 5.21951772744 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.479380295371 0.243740707755 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178908046735 0.0831039109588 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103239287867 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266801317691 0.150359130593 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112523289622 0.0667264976115 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.