As a relatively young person looking to join the workforce in the future, while reading such a topic my initial reaction is to disagree. However, instead of writing a personal reaction essay, I will try to look at this this objectively and give qualified reasons for my disagreement. Between two seemingly equally qualified candidates, the obvious choice for most companies would be to choose the more experienced one. However, we must ponder, is this always the correct choice?
Of course, experience is unequivocally an important criteria while hiring. An experienced person can adjust to any work environment faster. They already have a lay of the land and would be more efficient if given a task. Also, it would make it easier for companies to judge their social skills such as teamwork and coordination through their previous work experiences and would make them a preferential hire than an outlandish inexperienced candidate. That is why, while selecting fresh hires, companies often give preference to their interns or people who have worked there previously. This would help the company save up cost on training their hires and get work done more efficiently.
However, even though an easier and safer choice, this might not always be the best approach for a company. An inexperienced person brings a new, unbiased opinion and fresh ideas into a company. While experienced people might be tempted to approach a task in a similar, parochial manner, an inexperienced but efficient candidate might approach the problem in a more innovative way that might even impact the company in a big fashion. As history has shown great CEOs such as Bill Gates and Steve Jobs were not experienced when they started their own companies. They were in their 20s with limited experience and industry know-how. However, with their innovativeness and talent, they managed to grow their companies into one of the biggest brand names all over the world.
Then there are several young prodigious people in every field who, even though inexperienced, are much more talented than their experienced counterparts. For example, when Messi debuted at the mere age of 17 in competitive football, he was already a better performer than many experienced players. It is also seen that the value of experience differs field to field and generalising the value of experience in every job field would be wrong on any hiring team's part.
In conclusion, experience is important but while hiring a new candidate, there are several other criteria that one should look at. The given argument does not specify what criteria the two candidates are being judged upon and just focuses on experience. Instead, one should focus more on the temperament, talent and innovativeness of a candidate through interviews and tests to level the competition between applicants with varied degrees of experience and flush out the best candidates for the company's benefit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: this
...l reaction essay, I will try to look at this this objectively and give qualified reasons ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 53, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'criterion'?
Suggestion: criterion
...xperience is unequivocally an important criteria while hiring. An experienced person can...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 514, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st candidates for the companys benefit.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2450.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 474.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16877637131 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86366119968 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533755274262 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 768.6 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4268635807 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.363636364 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22727272727 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184020373181 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047589168905 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490680536489 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992274694158 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412626737883 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.