Glancing back through the pages of history, most major turning points in the narrative have unfolded as a result of people questioning authority. Whether it was the French Revolution or the Russian revolution - it was the people who questioned the rules of the authority and decided to change their current predicaments, who could make a mark in history. Throughout the history of mankind it has been proven time and again that, whenever the authorities are given unchecked power, there has been guaranteed misuse of this power. Thus, one should always understand, comprehend and question, if needed, the orders or rules laid out by the authorities.
However, the idea of questioning the rules of authority, in itself, doesn't need to be converted into physical actions necessarily. Sometimes, questioning the rules of the authority actively makes one understand the thought processes or the reasons that these rules are being laid out in the first place. For example, in a democratic country, all citizens who are part of the voting bank need to question and understand the rules laid out by their leaders so that they can be responsible citizens who take the best decision for their society as a whole. Likewise, from my personal experiences during my internships, even in a corporate setting employees are urged to question the orders given by their managers instead of blindly following them. This helps the employees feel like their opinions are being heard while, at the same time, ensure that every decision of the company is checked and verified before it reaches the implementation stage.
Thus, in an ideal, utopian world, every decision by the authority is questioned and discussed by all the parties affected before it reaches the implementation stage. However, the plausibility of this in a real world scenario is extremely difficult. For example, in the current setting where most countries are ruled by a democratic government, it is not feasible for people to have all their questions addressed individually by the authorities regarding every new law or bill being passed. Moreover, sometimes the common man might fail to see the bigger picture and understand the real reasoning behind a decision being taken by a more experienced authoritative figurehead. If the government were to consult every involved party before taking any decisions, implementing any administrative ruling would become an extremely long and complicated process.
The solution to this problem is mostly solved through the existence of news and social media. These allows one to question any laws and rules in any setting and even have one's questions answered by the authorities. However, it is only when the authorities curb the power of people to question their decision and try to gain unchecked power that it becomes an unhealthy dynamic where people are forced to take physical action against the authority.
In conclusion, questioning the rules of the authority and not passively accepting them is an important quality that will allow a healthy relationship between the authority and its subjects. However, questioning does not always need to lead onto challenging the authority or taking up action against the authority. It can simply be a means to understand the decisions taken by the authority. The lack of questioning the authority leads to both unchecked power on the side of the authorities and blind faith or rebellion from the people, neither of which is a good dynamic for a working society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 69, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ning the rules of authority, in itself, doesnt need to be converted into physical acti...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 643, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'employee'?
Suggestion: employee
...nternships, even in a corporate setting employees are urged to question the orders given ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 171, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... and rules in any setting and even have ones questions answered by the authorities. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, likewise, moreover, regarding, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2933.0 2235.4752809 131% => OK
No of words: 565.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19115044248 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87542086881 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89298370508 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488495575221 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 931.5 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1527306434 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.666666667 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9047619048 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04761904762 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183383767787 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564911209442 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420119916856 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112264291885 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305980241276 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.