People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the reasons for which the statement may or may not be true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It has always been said that do not follow anyone or anyone’s teaching or preaching blindly. It is the obligation of the people to give a thought about what has been said is it really for the goodwill of the society or the concerned area or people. The same is the case with people accepting the rules of authority passively. Although it might always be beneficial to follow the rules without questioning the authority, sometimes it would be great if a prolonged thought is given to the rules with the aim to understand the consequences or the after effects of following the rule.
People on individual level should always be aware of what is the rule, how will it affect the society, its citizens, nation or on a global level the entire world. The authority should be questioned so as to understand the underlying motive of the authority so as to know why the rule has been implied. Questioning the authority does not mean always to raise objections in a negative way. The doubts raised may as well be positive, so the people who are ready to follow the rule will do so willingly without any ill-will in their minds. Consider for example a simple rule imposed by the authority which states that as of now all the different kinds of taxes on products, services, etc will be clubbed together into a single tax. The people will surely not follow the rule blindly and instead raise questions to understand why this step was taken and what are the benefits or how are the common people going to get benefited. This questioning can be answered by the authorities easily and people would follow the rules happily.
Active participation of the people in knowing the rules is a very significant step on the part of the common people. The rules imposed may not always have a good effect for the people. For instance, if the authorities impose a rule which is only going to benefit the rich people of the society or it does not have a proper agenda as to why the rule is being imposed, the people raising question will give a hard time to the authorities. Instead of compelling to follow the rules blindly people raised their objections which had a negative effect on them.
However, it is not always right to question the authorities for each and every rule. The authorities are there at their level because of a comprehensive understanding about the ongoing situations and are well versed with the activities that are going on at a global level. For instance for protecting the nature and conserving the wildlife a law or rule has been passed which has significant positive effects on the nature, the people should in such cases follow the rule blindly and passively without trying to stir any objections. This will help the authority to take steps to further impose such rules with haste since no objections were raised for the similar kind of rule in the past.
Since there are so many varied opinions on the matter at hand, the topic remains a complex one where easy answers cannot be provided. There will always be difference in the thinking and ideas of different individuals. Perhaps, people would still follow their own custom of questioning each rule of the authority actively and other may follow the rules without giving it another thought.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...rld. The authority should be questioned so as to understand the underlying motive of the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 258, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... the underlying motive of the authority so as to know why the rule has been implied. Que...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 338, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put before the verb 'mean'.
Suggestion: always mean
...ied. Questioning the authority does not mean always to raise objections in a negative way. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 370, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...oes not mean always to raise objections in a negative way. The doubts raised may as well be posit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, really, so, still, well, as to, for example, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2690.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 568.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73591549296 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88187981987 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59897321523 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.417253521127 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 859.5 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0316716417 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.272727273 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210227062744 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818826414186 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558783945239 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14113497397 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476537249783 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.