A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio.“We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10% in order to ensure a quality product. As you know, we are working with a first-time director, whose only previou

Essay topics:

A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio.
“We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10% in order to ensure a quality product. As you know, we are working with a first-time director, whose only previous experience has been shooting commercials for a shampoo company. Since the advertising business is notoriously wasteful, it stands to reason that our director will expect to be able to shoot take after take, without concern for how much time is being spent on any one scene. In addition, while we have saved money by hiring relatively inexperienced assistant producers and directors, this savings in salary will undoubtedly translate to greater expenditures in paying the actors and unionized crew overtime for the extra hours they will spend on the set waiting for the assistant directors and producers to arrange things. If we don’t get this extra money, the movie is virtually assured to be a failure.”
________________________________________
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.

The movie producer's advice to the head of the movie studio to increase the funding of the movie by 10% so that because they are working with first-time directors and inexperienced crew and hence the movie would fail, ignores certain crucial assumptions.

Firstly, the producer says that the budget should be increased by 10% because they are working with fresh director, who only shot shampoo commercials and they are notorious for their extravagance. However, he fails to acknowledge, just because it is said that advertising companies are very wasteful, so was the company that the director worked for and that he will follow the same trend. Had the producer said specifically that the shampoo company, the director worked for was notorious in wasteful spending, the claim would not have proven unsound.

In addition, the producer presumes that since the new director worked for an advertising company, he will be of the same prodigal mind as those companies are, but fails to substantiate this claim. He might not at all be wasting any money and very diligent with his work and actually saves money rather than wasting it shooting takes after take. The producer is unable to justify his correlation between the ad companies that are wasteful and the company the director worked for was also one of them and that the director as well is of the same mind set.

Furthermore, the producer proffers that the movie studio has saved money by hiring relatively inexperienced professionals that is, the assistant producers and directors, on lower wages. The reason that the movie requires the initial budget to be increased by 10% is might be due to that. The callow assistant producers and directors might not be trained well enough to do their job, lagging the whole crew. The writer fails to take this reason into account and renders this claim invalid.

Thus, the argument that the movie budget should be raised by 10% otherwise, the movie is virtually assured to be a failure is spurious. It lacks the cogency and fails to authenticate its conclusion.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 408, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...o do their job, lagging the whole crew. The writer fails to take this reason into a...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, then, thus, well, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.6327345309 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 28.8173652695 118% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 55.5748502994 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 16.3942115768 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 2260.96107784 76% => OK
No of words: 344.0 441.139720559 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00290697674 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63593232024 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 204.123752495 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485465116279 0.468620217663 104% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 705.55239521 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.76447105788 148% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2434400215 57.8364921388 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.384615385 119.503703932 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4615384615 23.324526521 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 5.70786347227 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316646668896 0.218282227539 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113670366062 0.0743258471296 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106369953742 0.0701772020484 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200993728362 0.128457276422 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121259119777 0.0628817314937 193% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.3799401198 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.3550499002 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.5979740519 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 98.500998004 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 12.3882235529 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

argument 1 -- OK

argument 2 -- somehow duplicated to argument 1

argument 3 -- OK
----------------

also need to argue:

If we don’t get this extra money, the movie is virtually assured to be a failure.

------------------

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 344 350
No. of Characters: 1670 1500
No. of Different Words: 162 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.307 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.855 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.575 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 114 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 91 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 60 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 34 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.462 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.872 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.692 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.375 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.643 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.143 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5