“When something is judged as ugly or lacking in style, it is because it is being perceived by someone other than its target audience."
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Is it always true that something considered beautiful by someone becomes the quintessential definition of what beauty is? Not many of us would agree. They say that “Beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder” and I truly concur with that statement. I believe that beauty is subjective and how a single person perceives someone or something solely depends on their likings and mood. This could be better understood with the examples Art and Literature.
For each single person the definition of beauty is different. The field of Arts is the best example one could rely upon. For many of the works of art there may be admirers who would go to lengths and boast about a particular piece of painting that they liked so much and for that painting there may be detractors who wouldn’t even like a single thing about them. This specific contradiction clearly suggests the subjectivity that beauty entails. There might be various aspects of that painting that the detractor did not comprehend or he was not feeling what the picture emoted or just plainly did not like that piece of art. For the famous artists like Vincent Van Gogh, Leonardo Da Vinci, etc there were various criticisms about their work and there were people who just truly cherished their art.
Another such example could be found in the works of literature, particularly in the work of Dan Brown, a novelist who indulges in mystery and thriller. His book, The Da Vinci Code, particularly, was the centre of many conspiracies when it got released and due to what it contained, it was banned to be published at certain places. There was a bedlam of priests and popes over to completely bar this book from people to read as it contained fallacious and blasphemous information about Jesus Christ. But the followers and admirers of Brown’s work, hungry for that particular genre, thoroughly enjoyed the intricacies and punctilious information leading towards solving the conundrum.
By my reckoning, it would not be wrong to say that it is actually the beholder who truly discerns the beauty or the fault with someone or something. And if it is made according to the likes of the person viewing it, he or she will definitely consider it as pulchritudinous.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1863.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 377.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94164456233 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84551969223 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533156498674 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7478256904 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.588235294 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1764705882 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.52941176471 5.21951772744 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.097562289397 0.243740707755 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330981352365 0.0831039109588 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341546440388 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0699319770247 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402547744451 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.