The author posits that local advertising agencies have cancelled their contracts with late night news channel program. Due to less coverage of weather and local news they have cancelled their scrolling in the particular program and also people are complaining about only channeling the national news. However, the argument can be considered veracious if the three questions are answered.
Firstly, the timing of the program is not mentioned. What if the agencies have called off their agreement because of timing of the program and have included them during the alternative time when TRP rating is high in the channel ? This would make the argument more abstruse as it doesn't have any evidence.
Secondly, the are no charts comparing the rating when weather and local news are included and excluded. So, even if the particular news is embedded what is credence that the advertisers would come back to reinitiate the discussion on the agreement ? If this is considered a possible fact the argument is further weakened.
Lastly, most people would sleep ideally by 10 PM in the night. what if even the news is included none of them watches as it is not fruitful for them during sleeping hours ? Everybody would love to entertain themselves after a tiring day at work and prefer to watch comedy shows or movies instead of waiting for the late night pragmatic news. This fact could furthermore make the argument less impactful.
To conclude, the argument is flawed due to many unwarranted assumptions. This can be considered viable only if the author could provide the answers and evidence to these misleading questions.
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 7 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 267 350
No. of Characters: 1322 1500
No. of Different Words: 146 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.042 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.951 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.566 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 95 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 75 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 57 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.071 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.224 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.349 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.607 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.095 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...d make the argument more abstruse as it doesnt have any evidence. Secondly, the are...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 11, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... doesnt have any evidence. Secondly, the are no charts comparing the rating when wea...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tiate the discussion on the agreement ? If this is considered a possible fact the ...
^^
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
...ld sleep ideally by 10 PM in the night. what if even the news is included none of th...
^^^^
Line 7, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te night pragmatic news. This fact could furthermore make the argument less impac...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 13.6137724551 29% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 28.8173652695 59% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 55.5748502994 45% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 2260.96107784 60% => OK
No of words: 266.0 441.139720559 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11654135338 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.56307096286 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64784764251 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 204.123752495 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545112781955 0.468620217663 116% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 705.55239521 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3680172877 57.8364921388 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7333333333 119.503703932 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 23.324526521 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 5.70786347227 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239039424184 0.218282227539 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759829273865 0.0743258471296 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685422346867 0.0701772020484 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119294469857 0.128457276422 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690829327739 0.0628817314937 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.3799401198 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.3550499002 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.5979740519 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 98.500998004 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.