This argument is invalid for a plethora of reasons. The statement begins as Paleo diets, in which one imitates eating habits of hominids is becoming popular. However, it does not state the age group among which its popular or provides no demographics to judge proposed statement. Assuming that Paleo diet is popular with young adults and those in 30's and 40's, a wide variety of diets are available now-a-days and we have better understanding of human phisiology and nutritional requirements. Hence, it cannot be outright stated that Paleo diet is popular due to sheer choice blindness.
The statement follows by saying proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth; the credibility of said proponents can be brought in question here to falsify this argument. Proponents backing a cause maybe following "a sheep herd" mentality, following the exact words of a few doctors and said scientists. Had there been detailed studies in proving the nutritional benefits of bone broth, this statement could be weighed rationally. This leads us to the followup argument where they "they believe" it has multiple positive benefits and there exists anecdotal evidence that people who consume bone broth have been reported healthier - there is no detailed analysis on the lifestyle of these people thus indicating that a number of external factors and the consumption of bone broth can be considered a mere concidence.
The statement summarizes by stating that ancient humans knew something about our physiology that we don't and that emulating their eating habits, we can cure many chronic illnesses. Science and modern medicine have evolved at a rapid pace and human lifespan has greatly increased over past few thousand years. Now-a-days, a human can be diagnosed and treated for a disease and the chances of sucessful recovery is diference of night and day when compared to ancient human medicine and mortality rate. Diseases on the other hand have drastically evolved from ancient times - every year for flu season, there are new vaccines introduced in the market for diseases which are scientifically discovered. Hence, whatever chronic illnesses, ancient humans had may not even exist now-a-days and babies born now could be naturally immune to said diseases due to the genetic makeup and wellbeing of their parents.
To conclude, the argument stated could be falsified due to the fact that majority of the information follows a "he said, she said" mentality and they hold no scientific evidence apart from anecdotal evidence that ancient humans diet applies well to modern day man.
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 9 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 421 350
No. of Characters: 2153 1500
No. of Different Words: 236 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.53 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.114 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.655 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 160 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 133 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 94 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 55 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.067 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.646 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.4 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.314 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.536 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.127 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... something about our physiology that we dont and that emulating their eating habits,...
^^^^
Line 7, column 110, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...hat majority of the information follows a 'he said, she said' mentality...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, so, thus, well, apart from, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 11.1786427146 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 28.8173652695 115% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 55.5748502994 77% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2231.0 2260.96107784 99% => OK
No of words: 420.0 441.139720559 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3119047619 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76952182108 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 204.123752495 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578571428571 0.468620217663 123% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 705.55239521 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.96107784431 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.8473053892 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.6799988983 57.8364921388 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.733333333 119.503703932 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 23.324526521 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.70786347227 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256609638569 0.218282227539 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859733067537 0.0743258471296 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775423254674 0.0701772020484 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135463149881 0.128457276422 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687949538752 0.0628817314937 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 14.3799401198 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 48.3550499002 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.197005988 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.5979740519 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.32208582834 115% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 98.500998004 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.1389221557 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.