The president of Grove College has recommended that the college abandon its century-old tradition of all-female education and begin admitting men. Pointing to other all-female colleges that experienced an increase in applications after adopting coeducation, the president argues that coeducation would lead to a significant increase in applications and enrollment. However, the director of the alumnae association opposes the plan. Arguing that all-female education is essential to the very identity of the college, the director cites annual surveys of incoming students in which these students say that the school's all-female status was the primary reason they selected Grove. The director also points to a survey of Grove alumnae in which a majority of respondents strongly favored keeping the college all female.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
The circumstances of Grove College entice the coeducation by the recommendation from president of Grove College because other all-female college increase applications after adopting coeducation. However, there are rejection from the alumnae association because of the identity of Grove College, primary reason that is all-female college from incoming students. However, there are three unsubstantiated evidences that don’t match with the argument; even it will be illogical to fathom. Thus, three questions should be answered in the argument.
First of all, the question need to be answered is that how does Grove College will do the same as the other all-female college. President of Grove College convinces the idea that because other all-female college adopt coeducation, they increase applicants so as Grove College does. However, it can’t be general accepted when it comes to comparison between Grove College and other all-female college. Grove College will have the different curricula from other all-female college, which means that strategy of increasing applicants by adopting coeducation can have defect. Thus, there should be explanation about how to function about coeducation.
Secondly, the question should be answered is that how many percentage do incoming students keep Grove College all female? There is only explanation some incoming students want to keep Grove College all female. It is possible to have more percentage to change the Grove College system to coeducation. Also, annual surveys of incoming students are not representative for all incoming students. Some students who registered can be only valid in the response of this annual surveys.
Last but least, the question should be answered is that how much do Grove alumnae know about the circumstances of Grove College. The director of the alumnae association contradicts president’s recommendation with the reason that keep the college all female. However, there is no specific evidence of correlation between what director asserts and why alumnae want to keep Grove College all female. Majority of respondents from alumnae keep the college all female, but it can be different reason.
In conclusion, author concludes that recommendation of president from Grove College and contradiction of the recommendation from director with unproven evidences. However, if author adduces the argument with three question answered, then the argument will be more cogent to understand to sound.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 569, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'defected'.
Suggestion: defected
...icants by adopting coeducation can have defect. Thus, there should be explanation abou...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 599, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
... can have defect. Thus, there should be explanation about how to function about coeducation...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 652, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bout how to function about coeducation. Secondly, the question should be answere...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun percentage seems to be countable; consider using: 'many percentages'.
Suggestion: many percentages
...question should be answered is that how many percentage do incoming students keep Grove College...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in the response of this annual surveys. Last but least, the question should be a...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 501, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...female, but it can be different reason. In conclusion, author concludes that rec...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 28.8173652695 56% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 16.3942115768 165% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2119.0 2260.96107784 94% => OK
No of words: 372.0 441.139720559 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69623655914 5.12650576532 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01558152507 2.78398813304 108% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 204.123752495 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.405913978495 0.468620217663 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 677.7 705.55239521 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59920159681 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7638821192 57.8364921388 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.95 119.503703932 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 23.324526521 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.70786347227 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392394178798 0.218282227539 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158611527611 0.0743258471296 213% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145722559927 0.0701772020484 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251325644067 0.128457276422 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117962875768 0.0628817314937 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 48.3550499002 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.5979740519 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 98.500998004 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 12.3882235529 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.