A recent poll in the city of Mac FastFood indicated that 20 percent more people prefer to eat out frequently now than was the case ten years ago, according to a poll conducted then. Local government tax data also indicates a similar increase in the percentage of taxes collected from the food industry. Since the food-regulation body introduced stringent measures to ensure good quality of food, several restaurants are on the brink of closure. Therefore, it is recommended that the local government divert some of the funds for city administration and development to these restaurants to revive them. Since the number of people who eat out regularly will keep increasing every year, the restaurants will have adequate business. Hence this move will help the local government to recover the investment in the form of taxes in a short time.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
The recent poll results provide analysis pertaining to increasing percentage of denizens eating out frequently, as compared to ten years prior- the numbers indicate changing trend, the emphasis on restoring certain restaurants afflicted by onset of new food-regulations requires diverting funds away from administration as per the recommendation. However, despite the availability of corroborating evidence, namely higher tax revenues and residents preferring to dine in physical locations, there are questions raised demanding closer scrutiny. The potential implications and possibilities need thoughtful deliberation, the argument's validity could be undermined if these remain unaddressed.
From the outset, the issues relating to methodologies of scholarly surveys completed at the present time, as well as, the previous point must be ascertained. The passage delineates on city dwellers intimating their choices: more anecdotes, documents germane to the design, the population sampled, the outcomes and limitations facilitates insights into the accuracy of the primary data. Only by knowing all the aforementioned, even for the earlier published article, is cross-checking the conclusions, the patterns gleaned from both enables prudent comparisons of characteristics, tastes and age-group or income-specific iterations in the particular momentary end-points. The citizens in the town, of the other time-period and the current one, might not represent the dine-out people of the respective time-slots being contrasted, in this case, the veracity prompts either redoing the academic works or closely checking the secondary reports from credible sources.
Additionally, detailed breakdown of local authority levies imposition and collection may be requested for careful opinions. Merely the enhancement has been noted; the base over which the augmentation took place would have to be known, the overall additions or depletion from a compartmentalized start and end-point, whether or not the earnings subsume as part of a broader, overarching accretion along many years. Furthermore, the types of charges also necessitate examining- the budgetary spending for activities in its' purview perhaps acquired from income taxes rather than supplementary duties, then the statement hints at the specific sectoral support affected greater vis-a-vis the earmarked money for shoring up small-business entrepreneurs. The existing larger businesses generate relatively improved viable acquistions for the government without causing negative effects on ongoing plans, customer habits and employment.
Finally, the feasibility of different policies concerning the eateries on the brink of closure should be explored. The parleys with the food-regulating executives, the synthesized writings in peer-reviewed journals about the area's food culture engenders understanding on the quality control, hygeine practices and the probable effects: the likelihood of alleviating the rigor of latest rules, subsidies to the impacted owners' for switching product lines, moving employees or alternative configurations like assisting with take-aways as a offset to costs due to stricter clauses ought to be studied judiciously by juxtaposing facts gathered from the ground with correct market research whose citations can be correctly verified. Similarly, the methods elaborated in the preceding paragraphs made transparent so the verisimilitude of the papers allows pondering on executive action.
To conclude, multiple assumptions implicit in the answers extended as above, such that some of them make or break the claims and reasoning offered. A few include, not restricted to, first, the abstract of the scientific experiments, secondly, the attention to minutiae information contained in the city-government penalties and lastly, the odds of determining the asperity of individual guidelines or options for cash to the proprietors adversely feeling the improper burden of owing fines and facing laws. The ramifications and modes of decision foundational on appropriate evidence-pool encourages the cautious selection from the set of all eventualities.
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 8 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 27 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 583 350
No. of Characters: 3480 1500
No. of Different Words: 410 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.914 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.969 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.291 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 292 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 256 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 198 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 138 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 32.389 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 15.279 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.444 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.25 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.516 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.021 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 625, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arguments'' or 'argument's'?
Suggestion: arguments'; argument's
...ities need thoughtful deliberation, the arguments validity could be undermined if these r...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 317, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... compartmentalized start and end-point, whether or not the earnings subsume as part of a broad...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'areas'' or 'area's'?
Suggestion: areas'; area's
...ngs in peer-reviewed journals about the areas food culture engenders understanding on...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 377, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
...the likelihood of alleviating the rigor of latest rules, subsidies to the impacted owners...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 537, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tions like assisting with take-aways as a offset to costs due to stricter clauses...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.6327345309 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 11.1786427146 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 13.6137724551 22% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 28.8173652695 21% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 55.5748502994 146% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3559.0 2260.96107784 157% => OK
No of words: 583.0 441.139720559 132% => OK
Chars per words: 6.10463121784 5.12650576532 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91379618374 4.56307096286 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35897672725 2.78398813304 121% => OK
Unique words: 410.0 204.123752495 201% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.703259005146 0.468620217663 150% => OK
syllable_count: 1107.9 705.55239521 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59920159681 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 25.0 8.76447105788 285% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 34.0 22.8473053892 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 122.376496601 57.8364921388 212% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 209.352941176 119.503703932 175% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.2941176471 23.324526521 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 5.70786347227 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105025765407 0.218282227539 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0246716805455 0.0743258471296 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387881851399 0.0701772020484 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0505408832428 0.128457276422 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468317703308 0.0628817314937 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.4 14.3799401198 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 11.59 48.3550499002 24% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.1628742515 204% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.1 12.197005988 165% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.69 12.5979740519 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 12.99 8.32208582834 156% => OK
difficult_words: 283.0 98.500998004 287% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 12.3882235529 129% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.1389221557 140% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.9071856287 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.