By convincing the claims that now newly introduced pine tree dollar coin is usual in popularity. He concludes, that the papers would be gradually diminished right in the treasury of the judgment of the printing of the dollar that he can take a lot of the broad saving money is very expensive. By convincing the states of the Presidential dollar coin and a dollar coin eagle observed at 3 years and 11 respectively will not be able to join in; For the dollar coin with the Midas, king of the popular and common as a result of a aliquet have already told. The argument has come to persuade convenient to be, as soon as I have read. However, we consider the matter reveals several flaws that succeed in weakening the argument.
Tells us, the common sense, rather the dollar that money to the semper laoreet. It is obvious. Many easy to fit the doll can be easily doll laoreet bag and tie it around. On the other hand, they are bulky and full of money. Marsupia money into the network and it is difficult to do, because of the size. Therefore, we consider the public treasury contest Laoreet dollars of high pressure seems unlikely.
By convincing a substantial problem that they can prove that they will not be able to provide more will the King Midas dollar coins and dollar bills into popular use. I mean not that other reasons, so that the brothers are owned by the king Midas, looking round about for the dollar coin. It is likely that with the dollar coin was introduced Midas, king of the way they are, they have the money that the men of his desires and needs.
62 percent of the respondents since it implies that to the doubts the fact that very many of the same as for the proof of the costs of cash makes a sound when they do not want to use. This is the money that is already in motion once worn initial euphoria. Therefore, argued the dollar's claim that printing can be reduced Laoreet not find adequate support in discussion as there is in terms of the results was carried by trucks.
In the absence of such, the reader can not be convinced that there are savings by reducing the printing of dollars et. In the final analysis, it is not so much the claim to this complaint supported.
Essay evaluation report
Out of topic.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 404 350
No. of Characters: 1751 1500
No. of Different Words: 198 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.483 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.334 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.254 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 106 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 77 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 44 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 23 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.263 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.229 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.421 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.293 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.526 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.095 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 526, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...f the popular and common as a result of a aliquet have already told. The argument...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, therefore, as for, i mean, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 13.6137724551 125% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 28.8173652695 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 55.5748502994 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 16.3942115768 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 2260.96107784 80% => OK
No of words: 404.0 441.139720559 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.4801980198 5.12650576532 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31571543728 2.78398813304 83% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 204.123752495 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485148514851 0.468620217663 104% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 705.55239521 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59920159681 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.96107784431 222% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5900595455 57.8364921388 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2631578947 119.503703932 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2631578947 23.324526521 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21052631579 5.70786347227 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0111361996015 0.218282227539 5% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00434891731387 0.0743258471296 6% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0101217302417 0.0701772020484 14% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00903486979018 0.128457276422 7% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00859437793032 0.0628817314937 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.3799401198 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.3550499002 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 12.5979740519 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.32208582834 94% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 98.500998004 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 12.3882235529 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.