The argument states that internship increased the chances for a job from a recent survey of college graduates in which 90% of them participated. It is supported by the ground that sky way design offered internship to students of all departments having a good work balance life and the experience played a vital role in their placement. However to conclude the author must answer the following three questions.
Only 90% of them participated in survey and only 40% has completed the internship what if the remaining percent people have completed their thesis and got a direct placement using their research knowledge and for playing a vital role in such pragmatic projects which are chimera in current world ? This would stand in need of more talent than only using the google references to solve quantitative problems. If this is considered a fact then it would weaken the argument.
Secondly the number of people who actually joined after the placement was not clearly exposed. what if there are handful people who want to go for higher education and not actually crying for a job ? Even though they might have done internship the practical amount of placements would be lower than expected, weakening the argument even more.
Furthermore the remaining 10% didn't take part in the survey. What if they instead of finding a job want to be more creative and form a company of their own and establish an empire to create a revolution in this technological world? They would not be desperate for a job instead they would be searching for creative talent to employ for a new startup. If this is a practical posit the argument would be weakened additionally.
Considering the above questions the argument is flawed having various unwarranted assumptions this could be considered viable only if the author provides answers to these misleading questions.
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 308 350
No. of Characters: 1515 1500
No. of Different Words: 169 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.189 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.919 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.733 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 114 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 81 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 62 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 44 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.692 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.985 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.615 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.339 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.339 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.057 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 337, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...played a vital role in their placement. However to conclude the author must answer the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 408, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...erences to solve quantitative problems. If this is considered a fact then it would...
^^
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en the argument. Secondly the number of people who actually joined after the pla...
^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
... the placement was not clearly exposed. what if there are handful people who want to...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...ted, weakening the argument even more. Furthermore the remaining 10% didnt take part in th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 31, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...en more. Furthermore the remaining 10% didnt take part in the survey. What if they i...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 351, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ive talent to employ for a new startup. If this is a practical posit the argument ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 55.5748502994 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 2260.96107784 68% => OK
No of words: 307.0 441.139720559 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02280130293 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78031011183 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 204.123752495 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547231270358 0.468620217663 117% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 705.55239521 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0412887054 57.8364921388 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.142857143 119.503703932 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 23.324526521 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.70786347227 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198020552228 0.218282227539 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604526182154 0.0743258471296 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874270415489 0.0701772020484 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101932170964 0.128457276422 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794022417646 0.0628817314937 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.3799401198 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.3550499002 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.32208582834 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 98.500998004 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 12.3882235529 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.