More data and researches should be released to strengthen the recommendation that a news and talk format will be a better choice for WWAC radio station to increase listeners. Otherwise, the argument lacks sufficient reinforcement, and consequently, the recommendation is invalid.
Surveys should be launched by the managers of WWAC radio station to figure out whether the decline of radio listeners is attributable to retirees’ dislike of rock music although the number of retirees has incremented. If the results of surveys show that retirees listen to rock music in TV or on internet or other radio stations, it does not mean that they do not like the rock music format but WWAC’s rock music station are not so intriguing to listeners. Therefore, changing to news and talk format cannot being dragged out of the dilemma of reduction in listener numbers. To strengthen their recommendation, they must justify retirees lose interest in rock music and like new and talk format.
Secondly, more information should be given to prove that consistent dwindling in local sales of recorded music stands for people less interest in music, especially rock music. The author presumes that they do have limited passion on all music types including rock music than before. Therefore, music formats do not tailor to local market, instead, news and talk format must reverse the decline of listener numbers. Unless wars or the ends of day loom in, music might be the most popular recreational way for most people, which means that they might still fascinated in music. Less records in the local market might be interpreted that people are buying records on music APPs and buying concert tickets, particularly, for rock music. Hence, the reason behind decreasing record sales might not be outdated and unpopular.
Thirdly, speculating that local people have descending fascination towards music, more testimonies should be delivered by the manager of WWAC on how the news and talk format can allure more local people to stay beside WWAC radio station. Confidence might be from a phenomenon that it is increasingly popular in local area, however, they should investigate whether other rival radio stations have the same program and have accumulated a larger base of listeners. If so, they should give a second thought whether WWAC can defeat over others. Only when they have more competent anchors and adequate advertisement to endorse themselves might they draw some people to listen the news and talks formats in WWAC. Otherwise, it might be more disastrous loss than maintaining the rock-music format.
To conclude it, the manager should give more evidence to warrant the rock-music and other music formats does not cater to local people’s taste, but news and talk format can. Evidence might show that retirees and more others are not fond of rock music, and even all music genres.
Essay evaluation report
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- OK
----------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 467 350
No. of Characters: 2352 1500
No. of Different Words: 207 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.649 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.036 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.59 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 168 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 119 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 77 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 49 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.579 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.196 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.579 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.38 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.578 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.12 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 577, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun records is countable.
Suggestion: Fewer
...t they might still fascinated in music. Less records in the local market might be in...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, third, thirdly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.9520958084 170% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 11.1786427146 197% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 55.5748502994 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2430.0 2260.96107784 107% => OK
No of words: 467.0 441.139720559 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2034261242 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73618940879 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 204.123752495 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464668094218 0.468620217663 99% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 705.55239521 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1297656371 57.8364921388 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.894736842 119.503703932 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5789473684 23.324526521 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21052631579 5.70786347227 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220111480368 0.218282227539 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846406712609 0.0743258471296 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554720461132 0.0701772020484 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129894943836 0.128457276422 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580831221079 0.0628817314937 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.3799401198 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.5979740519 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 98.500998004 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.