Parenting is a demanding task for most parents because parents have to work for raising families in workdays. Whether all parents should be required to volunteer time to their children’s school is a contentious issue. I have a clear-cut decision that parent involvement to children’s school is not mandatory but optional.
For parents, this requirement to children’s school is not flexible and would not become efficient as school expected. Firstly, parents have to work in daytime from Monday to Friday. If school chooses to have teacher parent conference, most parents might not be accepted by their companies to take leaves because they must tackle the urgent programs at hand or take operations to patients and etc. Still, some parents work or take business trip in other cities, participation to children’s school is impractical for them. Secondly, some parents are physically challenged or underprivileged, they might feel embarrassed and shameful in front of other parents. Compared to parents who are the fundraisers of schools and successful entrepreneurs or professors who can raise hands to share their parenting experiences, those who only supply foods and shelter to children would feel uncomfortable and guilty.
For children, this requirement will hurt children in several ways during puberty period. Children should mold communication skills, correct values and personalities as much as possible in schools when nobody, especially parents do not interrupt them. Therefore, if parents often involve their school life frequently, they have not sufficient time and space to be with other children. In that case, schools must be to blame for children’s alienation from others and impoliteness towards others. In addition, adolescents would be rejective to parents’ participation in schools because they have grown up and do not hope parents’ surveillance or ward all the time besides them. If they always step in to help them or give them suggestion what to do or not to do, parents would play the role of “enemy” for children and consequently impede their free growth.
For teacher, this requirement will trigger inconvenience of teacher’s management and inefficiency of teaching. Imagine that all parents sit in classroom and teachers stand in platform in front of parents, parents raise their hands to show their opinion such as “stop punishment to their children if they do not finish homework or bully other children.” However, no punishment means that teachers are irresponsible and ignorant of school’s regulation. Some improper suggestions would disturb regular management in school altogether and therefore influence cultivation for students. Besides, if teacher’s teaching schedules and teaching methods are always challenged or forced to suspend by parents who have disparate opinions for teaching schedule, this involvement will jeopardize teaching race and interrupt students’ learning.
Although parents volunteering to children’s school can enhance affinity bond between children and parents and help parents better instruct their own child at home, it is merciless to force all parents to involve children’s school life with consideration of inconvenience for parents, children, and teachers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
... at hand or take operations to patients and etc. Still, some parents work or take busine...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 914, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en would feel uncomfortable and guilty. For children, this requirement will hurt...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2829.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 491.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7617107943 5.05705443957 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32425569322 2.79657885939 119% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496945010183 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 830.7 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.5657991422 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.45 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.55 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227194605817 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966143637412 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606343360789 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173494589735 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430007680062 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.1639044944 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.