Parenting is a demanding task because parents must work to raise families. There are suggestions for all parents to be required to volunteer time to their children’s school. However, parents’ involvement to children’s school must not be mandatory but optional.
For busy parents and underprivileged parents, being required to volunteer time to children’s school is not flexible and would not be as efficient as schools expect. Firstly, parents must work in the daytime from Monday to Friday. If school chooses to have a teacher-parent conference, most parents might not be allowed by their companies to take leaves because they have to tackle urgent tasks. Still, some parents take business trips in other cities, so participation in their children’s school is impractical for them. I once heard of a story that Barack Obama did not miss any teacher-parent conference once although he, as the president of the United States, must cope with a multitude of tasks. However, supposed that a parent is doctor and must take an operation for a dying patient, requiring to participate in the teacher-parent conferences does not make sense.
Secondly, some parents are underprivileged, and they might feel embarrassed and shameful in front of other parents when involving children’s school. Compared to parents who are fundraisers of schools and successful entrepreneurs or professors who can raise hands to share their parenting experiences, those who only supply foods and shelters to children would feel uncomfortable and guilty. Certainly, school sponsors would like to blindly suppress the authority of other parents, particularly the underprivileged and flagrantly show their egocentric and incorrect philosophy of teaching and managing. Therefore, the attendance of parents who only afford children’s food and shelters is meaningless to change schools and students, and more seriously, the fundraiser parents’ ideas would ruin schools and students.
For children in their puberty, having their parents volunteer time to their school as a requirement could be damaging. Children should mold communication skills, correct values and personalities as much as possible in schools when nobody, especially parents, interrupt them. Therefore, if parents often get involved their school, they have not sufficient time and space to be with other children. Preparation of chorus competition and play performance helps children build friendship and enhance cooperation, however, parents’ involvement would make it in chaos because grown-ups are displeased to their parents’ surveillance or ward all the time. If parents always step in to help them or give suggestions, their children may see them as “enemy”.
For elementary and middle school teachers, requiring parents to volunteer time to schools will trigger inconvenience. Imagine all parents sitting in classrooms and teachers standing, parents then raise their hands to expression their opinion or make suggestion. This would disturb classroom management in school altogether and make it difficult to educate students. A parent whose child bullies others might suggest teacher no punishment to that child instead of suspension of schooling and introspection at home for several days. As a consequence, if school regulation is broken down, forcible involvement will jeopardize education.
Although parents volunteering to children’s school can enhance bonds between children and parents and help parents better instruct their own children at home, it is merciless to force all parents to be involved children’s school with consideration of inconvenience for parents, children, and teachers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 811, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'participating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: participating
...peration for a dying patient, requiring to participate in the teacher-parent conferences does ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 881, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...parent conferences does not make sense. Secondly, some parents are underprivileg...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...dren's school. Compared to parents who are fundraisers of schools and successful e...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 14.8657303371 209% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3174.0 2235.4752809 142% => OK
No of words: 547.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80255941499 5.05705443957 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83611736076 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35610557278 2.79657885939 120% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495429616088 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 927.9 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3487661343 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.25 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7916666667 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45833333333 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2398787941 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101781011476 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814325134894 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178812364846 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684281382205 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 12.1639044944 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 100.480337079 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.