The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals

In the 21st century, lives of people all over the world has been changed tremendously because luxuries and conveniences prevail in modern life. Although the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life may deteriorate mental and physical health, it stimulates people to become strong and independent individuals. Luxuries and conveniences are disparate issues which should be discussed separately.

Firstly, speaking of luxuries, it reminds people of expensive and designer brands. The existence of luxuries definitely enables people to have more crave to climb up higher ladders in every enterprise. The reason behind it is that most people want to have decent life with spacious houses or apartments, affordable children’s tuition and exquisite suits. To attain it, they must work hard and impeccably and then become more professional in their own industry. Therefore, luxurious houses, clothes, bags, cars would be allurement to propel them to become strong and independent.

Secondly, speaking of conveniences, they definitely grant people more opportunities to become stronger and more independent. For example, in college, students must finish their essays by surfing on internet and distinguishably sifting valuable information and materials. After dinner, electric dishwashers can help hustled commuters to relax or do jogging with wearable devices which check rate of heartbeat. Internet still aids people, especially those who desire to recharge in spare time, to learn more at home rather than going to other cities or schools in subway. Utilizing most of available time is still the best way to become more competitive and irreplaceable. Sorting out useful information, enhancing physical health, and recharging one own attribute to access to conveniences of contemporary life.

Some people rebut that people would be addicted to the luxuries and conveniences in contemporary life. They can show vivid and persuasive examples to validate this point. For example, some people only care about making fortune as much as possible and attaining prestige and recognition instead of pleasure of family affinity bond. In addition, some people plunged in playing PC games instead of doing outdoor exercise and make virtual friends. However, this is the case if too much crave for luxuries and too much attachment of conveniences are devoted. On the other hand, if people can appropriately employ convenience and treat value of luxuries, these are not demons to erode people’s physical and mental health and deviate from the nature of life.

Although the luxuries and conveniences possibly force people to live money-oriented, they would become stronger and more independent only if people rationally and correctly behold them.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, for example, in addition, speaking of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2341.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 415.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64096385542 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01234311809 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580722891566 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2309748209 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.476190476 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7619047619 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289234016972 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872028777897 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931584099847 0.0758088955206 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178744036715 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904057683355 0.0667264976115 135% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 48.8420337079 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.1639044944 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.