The stated argument is flawed for numerous reason. It clearly provides unambiguous information and on the basis of that no reasonable decision can be taken.
Firstly, the argument states that woven baskets that are made in palean have also been found in lithos village which is on the ther side of brim river. This river according to argument is very deep and broad and only can be croosed by boats but no palean boats have been found. So, the argument clearly assumes that this river would be always remained full of water for the whole year. It might be possible that in summers this river had dried out or even there might be no rain for a significantly long period of time. So, in these kind of situations, it is likely that few citizens of palea moved out to live in lithos village and there, paleans made their woven baskets and because they were made in lithos village, archelogists found that they are not unique but actually they were made by only paleans. So if argument provides more information about how much broad brim river is and provide the evidence about that without boat it can not be crossed , so it can strengthen the argument.
Secondly, argument is untanable because it does not state that there was only one route through river from palea to lithos. If there are other routes like roads which can be crossed easily, and if this becomes true, it will make an argument indefensible. So, to strengthen the argument, argument must be unambiguous and should provide that there was only one route through which paleans could go to lithos village.
Thirdly, argument states that no palean boats have been found. It may be possible that paleans had crossed brim river by boat and after sometimes due to some natural calamities these boats were destroyed itself. So, if this fact is considered, it makes the argument weak. So, if argument provides the reason why palean boats have not been found, it will make the argument reasonable.
In conclusion, to strengthen the argument, argument must provide clear and unambiguous information about the flaws above stated here.
Essay evaluation report
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- not OK
argument 3 -- not exactly
----------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 359 350
No. of Characters: 1687 1500
No. of Different Words: 157 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.353 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.699 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.34 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 104 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 80 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 50 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 22 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.438 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.791 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.812 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.388 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.6 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.084 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'would' and 'be'.
Suggestion: would always be
...rgument clearly assumes that this river would be always remained full of water for the whole ye...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ght be no rain for a significantly long period of time. So, in these kind of situations, it is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...gnificantly long period of time. So, in these kind of situations, it is likely that few ci...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 956, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... that without boat it can not be crossed , so it can strengthen the argument. ...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it will make the argument reasonable. In conclusion, to strengthen the argumen...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.6327345309 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 28.8173652695 118% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 55.5748502994 67% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 16.3942115768 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 2260.96107784 77% => OK
No of words: 359.0 441.139720559 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85515320334 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41356122313 2.78398813304 87% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 204.123752495 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459610027855 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 705.55239521 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0391929529 57.8364921388 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.9375 119.503703932 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4375 23.324526521 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.70786347227 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 6.88822355289 174% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169255327656 0.218282227539 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732350782684 0.0743258471296 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906865608842 0.0701772020484 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822604977339 0.128457276422 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806390778176 0.0628817314937 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.3799401198 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.3550499002 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.5979740519 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.32208582834 89% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 98.500998004 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.