Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people.Recently however archaeologists discovered such a Palean basket in lithos an ancient village across the brim river,from Palea.The brim river is very deep and broad and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat and no Palean boats have been found.Thus it follows that the so called palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
The author here states that woven baskets of particular distinctive pattern were found only in vicinity of palea village but recently they dicovered similar basket in lithos which is across brim river from palea and since palean could have cross river by boats and no boats were found the author concludes that the palean baskets were not unique.However there are certain flaws in the authors argument.
Firstly not finding any ancient boat nearby the river can not be conclusive that there werent any boats to cross the river in that era.There could have been certain calamities like floods or cyclone which could have destroyed or damaged the boats or it could have been drawn away also.Now since it is not very clear whether the paleans crossed the river and reached lithos village there are certain chances that they might have crossed the river and reached lithos, where they shared there knowledge about how to make palean baskets.
Also finding a certain thing from certain area does not justifies the logic that it is made by the nearby residents.Maybe the people from lithos would have bought these palean baskets from Palea there use or there can be a scenario were the baskets might had flawn across the river to the other side.
Therefore on the basis of these flaws I would like the author to find out firm evidence that there was noone who crossed the river and went across to lithos and also that the basket that they found in lithos is unquestionably made by them.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 5 15
No. of Words: 260 350
No. of Characters: 1213 1500
No. of Different Words: 126 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.016 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.665 4.6
Word Length SD: 1.988 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 74 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 47 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 17 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 12 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 52 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 26.321 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.8 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.539 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.838 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.168 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...that the palean baskets were not unique.However there are certain flaws in the authors ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...that the palean baskets were not unique.However there are certain flaws in the authors ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 386, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
....However there are certain flaws in the authors argument. Firstly not finding any anci...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gument. Firstly not finding any ancient boat nearby the river can not be conclus...
^^
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
... river can not be conclusive that there werent any boats to cross the river in that er...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 136, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...ny boats to cross the river in that era.There could have been certain calamities like...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 281, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... boats or it could have been drawn away also.Now since it is not very clear whether ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 286, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Now
...s or it could have been drawn away also.Now since it is not very clear whether the ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...edge about how to make palean baskets. Also finding a certain thing from certain ar...
^^^^
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'justify'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: justify
...ertain thing from certain area does not justifies the logic that it is made by the nearby...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'justify'
Suggestion: justify
...ertain thing from certain area does not justifies the logic that it is made by the nearby...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Maybe
...that it is made by the nearby residents.Maybe the people from lithos would have bough...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...wn across the river to the other side. Therefore on the basis of these flaws I would lik...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 55.5748502994 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 16.3942115768 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 2260.96107784 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 256.0 441.139720559 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8046875 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.56307096286 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19450607964 2.78398813304 79% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 204.123752495 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4765625 0.468620217663 102% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 705.55239521 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 19.7664670659 20% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 64.0 22.8473053892 280% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.775164952 57.8364921388 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 307.5 119.503703932 257% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 64.0 23.324526521 274% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 14.5 5.70786347227 254% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 13.0 5.25449101796 247% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262182206358 0.218282227539 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158041604521 0.0743258471296 213% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935904749933 0.0701772020484 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158041604521 0.128457276422 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0935904749933 0.0628817314937 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 33.2 14.3799401198 231% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 14.98 48.3550499002 31% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 27.1 12.197005988 222% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.45 12.5979740519 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.32208582834 117% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 98.500998004 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 12.3882235529 226% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 27.6 11.1389221557 248% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 28.0 11.9071856287 235% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.