Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
While some argue that the society,as a whole, need to work on saving the endangered species regardless of whether it is due to the influences of human activities, others assert that people should restrain themself from intervening the natural selection of species, particularly those which faces extinction without being spoiled by human beings. After weighting the evidence, it is clear that mankinds need to save the species that are facing extinction, despite the fact that the species might not be the consequence of human being's intervention.
Consider the example of the endangered animal, panda. Strictly speaking, the current catastrophic consequences to the pandas is not solely due to human activities, the fierce competiton in the nature, to a large extent, is responsible for the extinction of species. Nevertheless, had human stepped aside watching the exacerbation of the problems, pandas would have not been existengial. More precisely, it is the human interventions that save the some endangered wildlifes which could have been the oart of history otherwise. On a much smaller scale, society's intervention in saving all animals reinforce the awarness of protecting animals from human activities.
Furthermore, deciding whether the potential extinction of species is the consequence in relation to human activites is difficult. The development of technology and industrialization effect, to some extent,all species on the Earth, directly or indirectly. Air pollution, inproper disposing of chemical waste and the pollution of water, which severely influent the ecosystem and the rescources that wildlife rely on. It is the society's responsibility that expiate for what people have damaged the ecological system.
Withnotsanding, natural selection is immutable. Over-intervening in the competition of species will cause inbalance of the nature and consequently, leads to unpredictale results.
In final analysis, human being need, to some extent, to protect the endangered species from extinction. However, the society should legislate relevant regualations to suggest and specifiy how and to what extent that people need to intervene.
Sentence: Strictly speaking, the current catastrophic consequences to the pandas is not solely due to human activities, the fierce competiton in the nature, to a large extent, is responsible for the extinction of species.
Error: competiton Suggestion: competition
Sentence: Nevertheless, had human stepped aside watching the exacerbation of the problems, pandas would have not been existengial.
Error: existengial Suggestion: existential
Sentence: More precisely, it is the human interventions that save the some endangered wildlifes which could have been the oart of history otherwise.
Error: oart Suggestion: part
Sentence: On a much smaller scale, society's intervention in saving all animals reinforce the awarness of protecting animals from human activities.
Error: awarness Suggestion: awareness
Sentence: Furthermore, deciding whether the potential extinction of species is the consequence in relation to human activites is difficult.
Error: activites Suggestion: activities
Sentence: Air pollution, inproper disposing of chemical waste and the pollution of water, which severely influent the ecosystem and the rescources that wildlife rely on.
Error: inproper Suggestion: improper
Error: rescources Suggestion: resources
Sentence: Over-intervening in the competition of species will cause inbalance of the nature and consequently, leads to unpredictale results.
Error: unpredictale Suggestion: unpredictable
Error: inbalance Suggestion: imbalance
Sentence: However, the society should legislate relevant regualations to suggest and specifiy how and to what extent that people need to intervene.
Error: regualations Suggestion: regulations
Error: specifiy Suggestion: specific
flaws:
No. of Spelling Errors: 11 2
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.052 0.07
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 11 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 322 350
No. of Characters: 1787 1500
No. of Different Words: 168 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.236 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.55 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.117 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 140 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 116 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 84 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 63 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.467 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.295 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.338 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.587 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.052 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5