103. The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The best ideas are often depicted as thoughts which are superior to other mediocre ones and significantly alter the way we approach issues in our lives. Given this extraordinary characteristic of great ideas, it is seemingly reasonable to believe that they have singular origin, as there natures are. However, this essay would argue that the statement often holds true.
Definitely, in many fields, thinking of box inspired from uncommon stimulus, often leads to an excellent idea whereas trivial thoughts in commonplace things, though passionately made or not, easily yield tepid outcomes. In many fields, many impassioned searches for brilliant ideas end up with failure when researchers got seized within the boundary of ordinary things. which have been thoroughly examined and now have almost nothing to be advanced. However, turning our eyes to uncommon things often presents us unexpected insights. Biomimetics, for example, are used for searching for engineering breakthrough by mimicking how animals and and insects exert so great motional performances, which is totally out of realm of technologies.
However we cannot relegate interest in commonplace things to entire futility. Contrary to many people's perception that prodigious people bring up with great ideas out of the blue, or inspiration from unusual experiences play the key role, these seemingly sudden burst of idea are built upon extensive studies on ordinary things, as suggested by the statement. Einstein's relativity epitomizes this point. While people believe this entirely new theory as the product of pure creativity and impact from esoteric interest, it was completed via thoroughly examining Newton's dynamics, which was commonplace and mainstream in that era.
Without Einstein's interest and endeavors to ameliorate ordinary physics, the breakthrough would have never happened.
Like Einstein's case, if we delve into how our thoughts advances and breakthroughs, we can find that novelty triggers the emergence of the best idea, but its foundation is passionate interest in banal issues in the field. Without having tackled with commonplace things, one hardly possesses creativity to originally apply exogenous insights to pre-existing endeavors. Hence, passionately learning ordinary things is not mutually exclusive with thinking out of the box, but serve as prerequisite of it. Many shining cases of brilliant ideas are hyped as sudden to show achiever's success, but are exaggerated.
In conclusion, while the statement presents fails to present sufficient condition of the best idea, it suggests the necessary condition of it at least, which I think is cogent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are superior to other mediocre ones and significantly alter the way we approach ...
^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...within the boundary of ordinary things. which have been thoroughly examined and now h...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 638, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...g breakthrough by mimicking how animals and and insects exert so great motional perform...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...lly out of realm of technologies. However we cannot relegate interest in commonp...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 8, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of realm of technologies. However we cannot relegate interest in commonpla...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, whereas, while, at least, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2264.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 401.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64588528678 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94410758619 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60349127182 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1778793918 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.777777778 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2777777778 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197025355585 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546470260233 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306675505385 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937723024954 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362621589232 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.1639044944 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.38706741573 120% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 100.480337079 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.