The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Science is all around us and when start asking the right questions, ideas are born. Here the topic suggests that the best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things. Personally, I corroborate with the statement and think that passion and necessity are the founding stones for all the best ideas and inventions, but the representation that “best ideas” only come out of passion is where I have my reservations. Thus, I agree with passion being an integral part of being the source of ideas, but the all or nothing attitude around it seems excessive.
Firstly, the commonplace things are generally the place where we get most of our inspiration from, especially when we can strike a balance between the passion behind and the necessity of the idea. Most of our initial inventions started with a goal of making the human life easy and efficient. When our ancestors saw a spark when they rubbed two stones or saw a stone running downhill, they got interested in the phenomenon and gave birth to the most important ideas of mankind. To summarise that, most of the inventions in the ancient time was to ease human existence. As time went on the technology kept evolving and the chances of interest turning into inventions became better. For instance, the invention of the camera or telephones are epitomes of ideas that could make everyday activities of talking with people and preserving memories into the ideas that brought paradigm shift in the human lives.
Secondly, let us shift our focus from some thought out inspirations to accidental ideas caused due to an interest in quotidian activities. The time when the Kellogg brothers were trying to make bread by boiling granola, but left the batter out for too long, causing it to go soggy and giving rise to cornflakes. Or the time when, an 11-year-old left soda with flavour syrup and stirrer and formed the first popsicle. Furthermore, recently during the pandemic many people realised their true passions and started small home-based businesses to help the community and empower themselves.
Finally, before concluding, even though most of the statement has many aspects to make you consider it, but that should be done only if we are fully aware of the shortcomings of this proposed statement. There are many ideas, that require a long amount of time to be formulated and experimented, before they are released for public usage. Some of the top examples for that can be, the covid vaccines, Newton’s long drawn experiments to come up with the laws of motion etc. These ideas make us notice, that inspiration can lead us to a certain extent, but post that rigorous research and dedication is required to bring them to life.
In conclusion, mostly the findings are oriented in examining common things from the passionate interest however there are certain finding or innovations which need great enthusiasm in order to discover them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 339, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...ore they are released for public usage. Some of the top examples for that can be, the covid...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2428.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 486.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99588477366 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69647830978 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551440329218 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 763.2 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5220316307 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.789473684 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5789473684 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21052631579 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202393742955 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576934379993 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525846549467 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107035317714 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463247711515 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.