143. No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.
It is debatable whether it is necessary to include knowledge and experience from outside fields to improve a specific area significantly. I disagree with the statement because some fields of study can improve substantially without incorporating knowledge and experience from other fields of study. I will provide sound examples to strengthen my argument in the following essay.
Admittedly, a range of fields could make tremendous progress with the help of external areas of study. In particular, technology and politics need the expertise of other studies to achieve remarkable improvement. In the field of technology, Steve Jobs is a compelling example. Steve Jobs was the founder of Apple corporation, at which he created various innovative products, such as the iPhone, iPod, and MacBook. Apple products have been well-known and popular with their innovative features as well as aesthetic components. To invent such apparatuses, he integrated disparate fields of studies, including math, material science, physics, and aesthetic design. In addition, diplomats and politicians should not solely rely on their own political experiences in the political field. To accomplish further development, they should employ experts from different areas. For example, they should hire economic professionals as the economy plays a significant role in a nation’s well-being. Franklin D. Roosevelt had competent financial expertise. Thus, when the United States was mired in poverty and destitution due to the Great Depression, he implemented the New Dear project, which successfully stabilized the financial status of the states. Following the examples mentioned above, it is credible to state that several fields of study developed with the aid of expertise from other studies.
However, some areas of academic fields can succeed without applying pieces of knowledge from outside those fields. Mathematics and arts typically do not require additional learning from outside domains. To illustrate, math is based only on numbers and facts and solely on establishing new theories and solving problems. For example, when Pythagoras discovered a groundbreaking math theory called the Pythagorean theorem, which did not utilize specific knowledge from any other fields but only mathematics concepts and theories, he stuck himself in his room and spent decades of nights studying previous mathematical notions and ideas. Moreover, ingenuity and creativity are core components of art. Thus, artists usually spend most of their time thinking about innovative and creative ideas to reflect on their drawings other than studying other fields. Hence, it is not persuasive to contest that all areas of study need the help of different fields to bring out successful outcomes.
In brief, the author’s argument that no field of study can make substantial development unless it corporates the knowledge and experience from outside that field is unwarranted. Even though many areas can make more outstanding achievements by combining various fields, some domains still can make considerable progress by solely depending on their fields’ expertise and knowledge.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, thus, well, as to, for example, in addition, in brief, in particular, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2682.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 471.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69426751592 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00494916492 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571125265393 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 822.6 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.9576661682 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.75 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399127810767 0.243740707755 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100696430862 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127294151484 0.0758088955206 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27939746385 0.150359130593 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0986021261525 0.0667264976115 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.1639044944 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.38706741573 120% => OK
difficult_words: 164.0 100.480337079 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.