Issue 121
Some people claim that you can tell whether a nation is great by looking at the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists. Others argue that the surest indicator of a great nation is, in fact, the general welfare of all its people.
Some people claim that you can tell whether a nation is great by looking at the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists. Others argue that the surest indicator of a great country is, in fact, the general welfare of all its people.
In today's society, one should consider various aspects to determine whether a nation is great. One may understandably argue that the general welfare of all its people is the surest indicator of a great nation. However, the accomplishments of its rulers, artists, or scientists are crucial for a great nation.
Admittedly, the general welfare of citizens is a significant factor in a great nation. It is because a government should provide high-quality social welfare to benefit their people, consequently making the nation superior to others. Taking Sweden as an example, Sweden is known as one of the best countries possessing excellent social welfare programs. Sweden provides its people equal and comprehensive access to education and health care programs, including maternity. Old-age pensions and homeless shelters are readily available. Because Sweden allocates a large share of its budget to the social welfare section, many people reap benefits from the various social welfare programs, contributing to Sweden becoming a great nation. Thus, the general welfare of people can be the indicator of a good nation.
However, one should look at the achievements of rulers to state whether a nation is more remarkable than others. This is because the accomplishments of rulers can lead to significant advancement of a nation. For example, Abraham Lincoln, a former president and eminent pioneer of the United States, took the extra mile to make the United States a great nation. He installed the Emancipation Proclamation to free slavery across the country when slavery was a prevalent notion in the nation. Therefore, he eliminated discrimination and guaranteed human rights and constitutional justice in the government and society. His political achievements ensured prosperous lives for his people, and the United States became a great nation. Consequently, the astonishing feat of famous leaders can contribute to the country being heralded as outstanding.
Moreover, a triumph of artists is responsible for one nation being great because artists improve a nation's cultural and societal values. As an example, Dorothea Lange took candid photos of people living during the Great Depression, in which many people suffered from poverty. Through the support of the New Deal program, she could travel farther to country sides and capture the hardships that people were facing. Her photographs and artwork vividly depicted the realities of the economic decline, so volunteers were sent to help those people. As illustrated, her art pieces fostered the good lives of most US citizens. In addition, her artistic achievements have helped the US to portray its historical background and to be a preeminent cultural icon in society. Hence, artistic success is also essential for a nation to become great.
In summary, the accomplishments of leaders, especially rulers and artists, indicate a great nation. Individuals should constantly and painstakingly make accomplishments in their fields to devote their countries to being considered great.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 98, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: a nation; nations
...ion being great because artists improve a nations cultural and societal values. As an exa...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in fact, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2785.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 511.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45009784736 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01713911425 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483365949119 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 866.7 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.797321304 60.3974514979 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.4642857143 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 24.0 10.2758426966 234% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.523531660508 0.243740707755 215% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145174038185 0.0831039109588 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138442983677 0.0758088955206 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.3222320902 0.150359130593 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.19716931477 0.0667264976115 295% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 100.480337079 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.