1. Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The author of prompt adduces that it is important to provide the solution for the current problems instead of the possible upcoming problems by the governors. This is the claim with which I generally do not concur. Among the countless rearing reasons which give adherence to my viewpoint, I will list the most conspicuous ones in the following paragraphs to support my standpoint.
The first crucial point which should be considered is the priority of problems’ impacts over their due dates. It is more explicit if ask this question; which of these problems are more emergency? A current issue which possesses very slight influence over the society; on the other hand, the possibility of disaster occurrence in the next week. Of course, the fatal problem should have more importance; since it impacts can affect millions of people. A lucid example which should shed the spotlights over this reason could be an example of a flood. For example, there is the prediction of flood in a city for next month; in addition, the municipal is aware of lack of capacity by the swage system on that city for discharging the precipitations. In this case is it a wise action to ignore this problem and deal with the current minor problem? Absolutely, the response will be not; since this overlook will end with a disaster in a month which impact lots of citizens. Therefore, the impact of problems is more important than their usance.
Another equal crux reason which should be considered is the prediction of the problem is the easiest and cheapest way of dealing with that problem. Indeed, there is the idiom that prevention is better than the cure, which means preventing the possible issue is better than dealing with its existence. This idiom is valid in the leadership activities too; like the millions of financial and work sources are being used by the leader of society to give a service for denizens, any ignorance and underestimate of an issue could pave the path to fatal outcomes in the national scale. Therefore, if a governor knows about a possible issue, which threatens society’s sources, he should concentrate to solve it completely and prevent its uncontrollable and detrimental results.
Finally, it should be highlighted that the current problem is the outcome of previous ignorance about future problems in the past. In another word, if there is an issue in current status, it is the result of overlook done in the past about the possible problem. If the principle of prediction and prevention is captured and utilized by governors, there will be an impressive decrement in the number of problems. This assertation is verified by the Tehran University. According to the noteworthy intelligence research conducted at Tehran University, prediction and prevention can decline the appearance of possible issues in the future by approximate forty-five percentages.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons and factors depict that the problems should be considered according to their impacts, and prediction and prevention are better than dealing with the real problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 684, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nicipal is aware of lack of capacity by the swage system on that city for discharging the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 675, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by approximate forty-five percentages. To wrap it up, all the aforementioned re...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, so, therefore, for example, in addition, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2587.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 506.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11264822134 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7428307748 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89562651933 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462450592885 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 804.6 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9901467901 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.590909091 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31818181818 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223982992692 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765562439954 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527161427823 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136124283467 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399146587019 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 100.480337079 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.