1. In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author of issue claims that the striking contribution in any field of effort is impossible unless it was affected by the previous achievement on that field. This an assertion with which I generally do not concur. Among the countless reasons which support my perspective, I will delve into the most conspicuous ones to support my standpoint.
The first significant point which should be considered is the initial step of each field of endeavor which does not possess the rearing from the previous achievements. In this case, the other factors such as knowledge, hard-work, and creativity are effective on the result of effort. If I have to narrow down my assertion, I would prefer to pick the field of science which faces various type of achievements which do not have any backgrounds and they flourished for the sake of scholars’ creativity, intelligence, and hard work. For instance, the field of aerospace which is known in recent decades was only fiction for our forefather. However, for the sake of the scientists’ clever mind in NASA and the landed spacecraft in the moon, this field has appeared. This example lucidly illustrates that the first phase of any kind of activity is unsupportive from the ancestors’ achievement but they present that striking effect.
Another equally crucial point which should be considered is the error of generalization of success merely to the previous achievements. Indeed, there is a list of factors such as the knowledge and experts which paves the path for having significant contributions. According to the noteworthy refreshing intelligence data released by the Psychology Department in the Tehran University, the information and skill over an effort enhance its proficiency by more than the fifty-four percent. Based on this record, emphasizing solely on the ancestors’ achievement will be a vein action. Since a strange person with the topic could not achieve a crux outcome with only depending on the previous success.
However, what mentioned in the previous two paragraphs should not shadow the importance of the experiences. Actually, the experience and achievements from the past are spotlights which lighten the path for current developers. Since the developer is continuing a path which is partially passed by another person in the past. This passage could be either successful or unsuccessful, both of which are valuable for the current person. If the previous endeavors were ended to the success, it boosted the level of that field, and any activity will be a step further than it was; consequently, the running effort will be successful. If the past efforts were faced to unsuccess. This current effort would be at least errorless, which enhance the probability of success.
To wrap it up, based on the aforementioned reasons, the experiences from the past are important in achieving success but are not the only factor of achievement. Other factors such as knowledge, hard work, and creativity also possess the role in making a significant contribution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 586, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...pos; achievement will be a vein action. Since a strange person with the topic could n...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 227, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ighten the path for current developers. Since the developer is continuing a path whic...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 628, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the running effort will be successful. If the past efforts were faced to unsucces...
^^
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in making a significant contribution.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, however, if, so, at least, for instance, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2555.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 486.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25720164609 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12226442104 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495884773663 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 778.5 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8911380538 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.086956522 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1304347826 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30434782609 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26246470882 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078036892824 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549325694433 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150036308673 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523879285291 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 100.480337079 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.