Students should always ask for teaching content rather than accepting it negatively. The claim is every true, but meaningless in most logos centric subjects and somewhat cliché in the field of art.
In most of heavy logic subjects, breadth fall towards mathematical reasoning, the student is always asking, but each questions is already answered in the steps. For example, a mathematical proof of a law, such a gravity affecting plane’s flying projectile, each step is countless observation and calculation. Each calculation is already done thousands of time. While in the class, students will have the opportunity to follow the equation’s logic chain, calculate each step one by one, and reach to universal formula. It is every unlikely a student is given a string of formula without a complete proof, a proof is all the answers to all the questions.
Among many subjects of art, student are usually present some object or knowledge, and the professors usually explicitly disclaim every approach is possible and there is no right or wrong answer. A student now has autonomous responsibility to determine either accept status-quo, the PPT presentation, or compose a theory on her own. At least the lecturer is not stopping her.
After analyzing thoughtfully of above information, now we can ask, on students’ part alone, should student always question. Yes, I would like to say yes. “What next?” this is my first and forever question. After receiving the exemplar of human socialization, a student always reserve her right to ask for more. Maybe a student should further develop in this professional field, a true love for knowledge.
Some may put question in a strict negative and deductive way, but question go far beyond present known-knows. Questioning is the very first step to transcend what we learned today, and go beyond classroom to the final frontier.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, so, while, at least, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 11.3162921348 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 33.0505617978 33% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 303.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28712871287 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04866189252 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620462046205 0.4932671777 126% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4732336593 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2352941176 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88235294118 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143897759156 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460158295994 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422293439384 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0780385885628 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355040413073 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.