Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.

Technology is the sole requirement for human existence in today's competitive world. Without technical advancements, it will be near impossible to survive in today's modern world. Each activity of ours is mandated by technology which creeps into all of our lives in some form or the other. Whether technology enhances or depreciates how we communicate is a contentious issue. Technological advancements have gone a long way in creating new forms of communication, which fared far better than the traditional face to face communication.

First of all, technology helps us in connecting homo sapiens located in various parts of the world. Without social networking sites like Facebook, today's youth will be at a standstill; they will be no different than those who existed a decade back. Since social networking does not require face-to-face interaction, homo sapiens from different parts of the world unite in a common platform. Consequently, this form of communication helps students interacting with their potential employers and getting job offers; these days, the whole phase of recruitment has changed online, primarily because of social networking. Because, they eliminate the need to travel, this form of communication is mutually beneficial for the interviewer as well as the interviewee.
Moreover, these sites help parents to connect to their wards who stay abroad for studies or other reasons. Thus, technological advancements like social networking, bring the whole world before us, in the form of social networking sites. Moreover, use of technology is predominant in emergency cases in that; it saves the lives of the homo sapiens, who are at the brink of their death. For instance, in case of accidents, mobile phones can be used to call the nearby ambulance and do the necessary service. Similarly, when we need to intimate a piece of information to a person, and if it is an imperative situation, then we resort to short text messages. These messages have made the delivery of data to a person possible, even if he is involved in a meeting or some important commitment. Thus, by effectively utilizing technical wonders, we can deliver the right information to the right person at the right time. All these things happen in tandem, solely attributed to the use of technology.

Furthermore, communication between teachers and students has grown manifold, primarily because of the use of technology. Now students can participate in online doubt-clearing sessions organized by their tutors. Thus, the interaction between the tutors and students is facilitated and encouraged. Moreover, education through video-conferencing is in vogue today. Sites like course, provide the lectures of eminent professors from Stanford, free of cost to students available to worldwide and specialized sessions at subsidized prices. Therefore, standard education can be guaranteed to a wide range of homo sapiens and effective learning through interaction is possible by effectively making use of online features.

Above all, the developments in science have resulted in great incorporations into the technical devices. For instance, we can decipher whether a person is lying, by means of examining his voice modulation through means of cellphones. These kinds of devices, take communication to another extent, wherein application of scientific concepts will enrich our communication and make them more reliable and effective. Some may argue that the opportunities for human interaction are curtailed because of advancements in technology. They attribute their statement to the fact that, humans do not involve in face-to-face interaction. But, this claim is shattered by the new upcoming developments, some of them including: video conferencing, answering calls in mobile phones by means of 4G technology etc... As technology evolves, it will even create a form of communication in future, which exactly resembles direct interaction with other homo sapiens. When it happens, communication will transcend boundaries and homo sapiens will not at all need to move out of their seats.

All in all, technology connects homo sapiens over distance, help in rendering proper student-teacher interaction, instant communication during emergencies and leads to saving time needed to travel. While there is a view that direct interaction is not possible, they are indirectly made possible through developing advancements. Hence, technology plays a vital role in the communication process and it is a prerequisite for effective communication.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...a standstill; they will be no different than those who existed a decade back. Since ...
^^^^
Line 8, column 422, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...m more reliable and effective. Some may argue that the opportunities for human intera...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 866, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ill even create a form of communication in future, which exactly resembles direct interac...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 11.1786427146 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 28.8173652695 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 112.0 55.5748502994 202% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 37.0 16.3942115768 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3841.0 2260.96107784 170% => OK
No of words: 694.0 441.139720559 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53458213256 5.12650576532 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.13262893113 4.56307096286 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2599765135 2.78398813304 117% => OK
Unique words: 351.0 204.123752495 172% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505763688761 0.468620217663 108% => OK
syllable_count: 1223.1 705.55239521 173% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59920159681 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 4.96107784431 323% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 35.0 19.7664670659 177% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6466330665 57.8364921388 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.742857143 119.503703932 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8285714286 23.324526521 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.70786347227 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 8.20758483034 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.67664670659 235% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206182621087 0.218282227539 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501252731882 0.0743258471296 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469974194002 0.0701772020484 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113551419281 0.128457276422 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571515239182 0.0628817314937 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.3799401198 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 48.3550499002 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.5979740519 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.32208582834 109% => OK
difficult_words: 196.0 98.500998004 199% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.