The author's conclusion that Super Screen should allocate more money in advertising depends on the assumption that Super Screen movies' quality is good and people are not watching them because people do not know about them. This conclusion is based on fallacious and unwarranted assumptions. Lots of questions needed to be answered to justify such statement. For example are the reviewers who reviewed the movie are popular? or is the movie quality actually good?
First, Author states that the movies get lots of positive reviews. The question is who are the reviewers. May be they are not popular enough to attract people. There may be lots of reviewers and people usually follow only few popular ones. It is possible that Super Screen movie only gets review from unknown reviewers whom people do not follow. May be the popular reviewers gave bad comments about the movie. Again athor does not specify exact amount of increase of reviews. The percent increase might be only few which does not indicate Super Screen movie quality is good.
Likewise, Author specifies that fewer people attended super screen movies and advertising is needed to increase the number. But it is possible that the whole number of movie watcher is decreasing in that region. May be people in that area are no longer love to go to theater and watch movie. May be now they love to watch TV series or sports more. In that case increasing advertising alone will not increase number of viewers. At first it has to be found why they are not interested in wathing movie then measures has to be taken. Unless we can answer the question whether the total number of movie viewers has decreased or not, what is the exact number of decrease we can not come to any conclusion.
Finally, author assumes that the super screen movie qulaity is good and people do not know it. but we have to find answer of the question is it really good? or what kind of movie super screen making? may be people does not like it. For example, people might like super hero movie and super screen are making love story. Unless we get answer what king of movie people like author should not conclude advertising will increase viewers.
Lots of questions needed to be answered to conclude that super screen should invest more in advertising. Unless answering above question atuhors' suggestion might not be wise to take.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 5, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
The authors conclusion that Super Screen should all...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 424, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Or
...ers who reviewed the movie are popular? or is the movie quality actually good? ...
^^
Line 3, column 7, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e movie quality actually good? First, Author states that the movies get lots o...
^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: Maybe
... The question is who are the reviewers. May be they are not popular enough to attract ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (May) must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...eviewers whom people do not follow. May be the popular reviewers gave bad comments...
^^
Line 3, column 516, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... The percent increase might be only few which does not indicate Super Screen mov...
^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people attended super screen movies and advertising is needed to increase the nu...
^^
Line 5, column 554, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
...s has to be taken. Unless we can answer the question whether the total number of movie viewers has d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Or
...swer of the question is it really good? or what kind of movie super screen making?...
^^
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: May
...what kind of movie super screen making? may be people does not like it. For example...
^^^
Line 7, column 321, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Unless” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...and super screen are making love story. Unless we get answer what king of movie people...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 106, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Unless” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...reen should invest more in advertising. Unless answering above question atuhors sugges...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, if, likewise, may, really, then, as to, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1964.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 407.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82555282555 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33570877889 2.79657885939 84% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.429975429975 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 611.1 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3240721831 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.1428571429 118.986275619 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.5357142857 23.4991977007 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299205372378 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967641668834 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967839752694 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189693698154 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770409960766 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 14.1392134831 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.14 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.