In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as
much by watching television as they can by reading books
The ways of getting the knowledge has different source: it varies upon the attitude and preference of a person. In the above statement, the author asserts that in the age of television, books are the just trivial source of knowledge and television are the better sources than books. I completely disagree with the author’s claim and argue that in spite of technological development, Television cannot take the place of books in regards of acquisition of knowledge.
To begin with, books provide the comprehensive knowledge of any subject matter. For instance, if we want to study about the structure of DNA, we can make detailed study in the book with its diagrammatic and well-labeled figure. We can make a complete study of any subject matter in a coherence way, which can be found in the book. However, in the television, it generally gives basic and superficial idea. The information that was delivered from the television cannot be revised and no longer be retained, and the foregrounded informations in books be retained for the longer period of time.
Learning process which might be hindered by televisions can be better through books. Books reflect the originality of ideas but information can be fabricated in television. Better insight of ideas is in books because every genre of people can get their own type of versions whereas Televisions broadcast already planned shows intended for particular people. Books are eclectic and comprehensive in nature. With many advertisements and ads in television, a better reader can also be frustrated. But books are portable, can be often read in more convenient place for better insight. Even curiosity increases and culminates in reading a book but it can be thwarted in watching television.
Of course, the people frequently suffered from the high eye related problems due to the harmful, blue and ultra-violet rays coming from the television. This will be detrimental to the student who have eye problems and especially suffered from the dryness of eyes and surely it will impede in the learning process. One of my friends, frequently used the lubricating eye drop for moisturizing of his eye during the watching of television. Morever, it makes enervated and dull, on long standing of these types of rays producing technology and today, majority of the people are facing these eye problems and their sight of vision has been reduced. On long term, these types of rays might cause the cancerous disease. The above examples illustrate the defects of using of televisions or on using it for a long period of time.
However, some might argue that in our increasingly globalized world, television can provide the knowledge in a visual pattern which can be more comprehensive. However, isn’t that, why we should follow the comfort? If we do so, the knowledge or idea may be compromised. Little knowledge is perilous and may lead to the failure of work that we intend to due to lack of exhaustive ideas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 432, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...levision cannot take the place of books in regards of acquisition of knowledge. To begin w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 577, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ons in books be retained for the longer period of time. Learning process which might be hind...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 687, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can be thwarted in watching television. Of course, the people frequently suffere...
^^^^
Line 7, column 806, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...f televisions or on using it for a long period of time. However, some might argue that in ou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, well, whereas, for instance, of course, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2485.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 489.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.081799591 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94660106481 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498977505112 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 788.4 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8736351296 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.56 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.96 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316708294508 0.243740707755 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920971793325 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084298630908 0.0758088955206 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1632660707 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112013380562 0.0667264976115 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.