Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
It is pivotal to gather experience along with skills and talents, for any academic field, for all faculties of academics. It is because experience and skills are two essential mutual elements to get maximum and efficient knowledge on particular field. But it is not necessary for Any faculty to do something besides the fields of academics in their professions. So, I am not fully convinced with the author's above prompt.
It is the way to realize the importance of our learning and it's application and scope. So, in this regard, the above prompt stands important to faculty to spend time working outside their academic world relevant For the course of the course, there is a high chance that he doubts his own teaching and also he lacks some practical knowledge, which might be one of the most wanting credentials he and his students found in his teaching. And he gets chance to see and work on his own field besides teaching, he alongside with the work will be benefited highly. He will garner some creative and practical skills which are lacking on him. With the help of the well-skilled teacher, the activity will be finished efficiently. So, it is important to engage the faculty including both teachers and students in those activities.
It is not necessary for all faculties to spend time on working outside the academic world. It can be the wastage of time and resources. If all the faculty focuses on the outside work despite it is related to work, it can create lack of efficient faculties in the main work for certain time. For example; if a administrative staff also demands to work on the outside field, it can seriously harm any organization well-being and administration due to lack of efficient staffs in his/her absence. So, Any organization should carefully opt the necessary faculty member to require to work on the outside field, if necessary.
Additionally, if all the faculty members are strictly obliged to work outside the academic field, it will seriously harm not only the organization but also the faculty member. They might not afford extra penny,effort and time for extra work. Their main work, when they are compelled on the extra work, which will eventually weaken schools or universities' objective to give quality education to their children.
Proponents of his claim might argue that working on nearby outside work can give much more insights to the persons on their field rather than working on the same field all time. But it does not fit for all cases; focusing on only one subject matter of interest can provide better insights through better understanding of the problems and also helps in the inventions of new solutions.
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people. 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 58
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reasons and examples to support your an 73
- Educators should take students' interests into account when planning the content of the courses they teach. 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
...work for certain time. For example; if a administrative staff also demands to wo...
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , effort
...ember. They might not afford extra penny,effort and time for extra work. Their main wor...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2222.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 450.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93777777778 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7231073391 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 693.9 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4464787813 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.1 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325325628551 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104050671579 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110718712007 0.0758088955206 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178220411981 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862040420327 0.0667264976115 129% => OK
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.