The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
Talent and popularity are two related term which have relation as that of nail and muscle, or like tendons and bones. The prompt states that the real talent of a musician becomes biased (fallaciously judged) when he is in his acme of popularity, or in other words, his fame may directly shape the criteria in his favour. The prompt may seem obvious at the first, but when meticulously judged, it can not always be the case. The real talent can be assessed even during the peak period of his career when the judging committe is adept in judging the real talent, and also popularity is also an another judgemental criteria to prove the talent of the individual for most of the case, as no one can blindly praise the person without seeing the talent in him.
Firstly, it is solely upon the judicial committee to properly address the issue of determining the real talent of the musician. If the judicial committe can make various indexing factors to judge musicians talent like greater influence to audience, vocal notes used, versatility etc. If the judging criteria on this holistic approaches can be properly conducted then surely, the decision becomes unequivocal, and no one can raise issue on him. But, if the talent is inappropriately credited to the false talent looking at only his popularity, due to ineptness to the committee then surely the issue may rise. we can have plenty of examples of famous musicians like Beethoven, Kurt cobain, Jimmy Hendrix, Lata Mangeshkar and the like who were aptly judged during their peak time and no one has ever criticized them ever.
Secondly, people in this 21st century are no so dumb to support a musician who do not have quality to impress them. Everyone is provided by the cognition to recognize the soothing tone and more pleasurable tone from that of cacophopny. Who else support a musician like Pooja Dhinchak, who is well reputed for the notoriety of singing disastrous sound, like that of rattling of mouse? The greater support by the audience implies that he/she has glaringly obvious talent and has not gained popularity through his wealth of external factors beside talent.
Proponent of the statement provided above may claim that there are lot of people who have gain respect and love from a lot of fans but are worthless. I dont completely disagree with them, as I have also seem examples of 'viral Baba' from Nepal who is now regarded as a musical talent though he have no sense of music in him. But it is one among the thousands of cases and the fallacies of the statement outweighs the approval.
Thus. in sum, it can be clear that one do not need to die to be properly judged the talent in him; they can be judged appropriately when the judging committee is well committed to the duty assigned to them and people are rational enough to judge the real talent in front of them, rather than accepting the worthless ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'term' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'terms'.
Suggestion: terms
Talent and popularity are two related term which have relation as that of nail and...
^^^^
Line 1, column 423, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... judged, it can not always be the case. The real talent can be assessed even during...
^^^
Line 1, column 588, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'a judgemental' or 'another judgemental'.
Suggestion: a judgemental; another judgemental
...eal talent, and also popularity is also an another judgemental criteria to prove the talent of the ind...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 610, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...mmittee then surely the issue may rise. we can have plenty of examples of famous m...
^^
Line 3, column 690, Rule ID: JIMMY_HENDRIX[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Jimi Hendrix'?
Suggestion: Jimi Hendrix
... musicians like Beethoven, Kurt cobain, Jimmy Hendrix, Lata Mangeshkar and the like who were ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...from a lot of fans but are worthless. I dont completely disagree with them, as I hav...
^^^^
Line 7, column 204, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'seemed'.
Suggestion: seemed
...tely disagree with them, as I have also seem examples of viral Baba from Nepal who i...
^^^^
Line 7, column 293, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
... regarded as a musical talent though he have no sense of music in him. But it is one...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...the statement outweighs the approval. Thus. in sum, it can be clear that one do no...
^^^^
Line 9, column 7, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...atement outweighs the approval. Thus. in sum, it can be clear that one do not ne...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2383.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 502.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74701195219 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52970871833 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488047808765 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 769.5 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.196335956 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.176470588 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5294117647 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199372536942 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663652414973 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525429239863 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111607276266 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612187636816 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.