The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
For any unbiased assessment of an artwork to be possible, relative fame (popularity) of an artist shouldn't play any role. It always should be judged though a blind-eyed judge, who doesn't consider any other attribute than the art itself. Given this circumstance, judging a work of art at the times of an artist might seem irrelevant as " his or her fame might interfere with honest assessment". However, there are several reasons that might make the judgement of an art (music) more irrelevant, if it is assessed several generations after actual artist.
Firstly, music that was created by an artist at certain time would be only relevant to that time, and judging that music after several generation might prove it bland and insipid, which otherwise would have received well-deserved respect and fame. Music created in world war, for instance, may have enraptured audiences very well in those times; they would have been very interesting given the particular context. But, after more than 50 years, those piece of music don't have any relevancy; they would be deemed uninteresting- if not completely dull- by present-day audience.
Similarly, along with the content of music, as mentioned in previous paragraph, the taste of music among the audience might change with time, which would make older piece of music tasteless to audience of present generation. Classic music, for instance, was a very common and appealing to people few generation before. But, now those music, though liked by some part of audience, have become almost phased out. They have been replaced by rap and pop music; these kind of music enrapture audience more than classic. Ask anyone from this generation, which song would he/she prefer, most of them would say rap songs than classic. However, the situation was completely different few generations before.
In the same way, the sophistication of musical instruments have increased at ever-growing rate. Given this increase, the music that was created few generations back by simple instruments and recording procedure might sound very dull, though they were one-of-a-kind during their times. This sophistication in technology may have made us accustomed to only soothing pieces eventually changing our mark of good music, which can make our judgement of old music very much biased.
Finally, the proponents of above argument might argue that we may be biased by the fame of a person to judge a music piece. However, though one segment of audience and critic can be blinded by fame of a musician, the audience base and number of critics is so high in this twenty-first century that any music is destined to get unbiased comment from some part of audience or critics. It is almost sure that some flaws of a music piece will be pointed out clearly by some segment of audience. Even Bob Dylan, famous novel prize winner, has been criticised for his music pieces in the internet. So, through some point it is almost sure that a music point will receive a justified view of it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...assessment of an artwork to be possible, relative fame popularity of an artist sh...
^^
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... relative fame popularity of an artist shouldnt play any role. It always should be judg...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e judged though a blind-eyed judge, who doesnt consider any other attribute than the a...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 467, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ore than 50 years, those piece of music dont have any relevancy; they would be deeme...
^^^^
Line 9, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nstance, was a very common and appealing to people few generation before. But, ...
^^
Line 9, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce, was a very common and appealing to people few generation before. But, now ...
^^
Line 9, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a very common and appealing to people few generation before. But, now those mu...
^^
Line 9, column 300, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun generation seems to be countable; consider using: 'few generations'.
Suggestion: few generations
... very common and appealing to people few generation before. But, now those music, though li...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 332, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this music' or 'those musics'?
Suggestion: this music; those musics
...people few generation before. But, now those music, though liked by some part of audience,...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 461, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ave been replaced by rap and pop music; these kind of music enrapture audience more than c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 576, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'prefers'.
Suggestion: prefers
...his generation, which song would he/she prefer, most of them would say rap songs than ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, similarly, so, well, for instance, kind of, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2528.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 497.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08651911469 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68518736891 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517102615694 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 793.8 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7234258863 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.380952381 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09523809524 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121564094358 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406456828003 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416116647802 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0731875220865 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598820267782 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.