The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you a

Essay topics:

The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

The claim of the author that the honest assessment of the real talent of popular musician would be interfered by his fame and thus can only be accurately assessed after the musician is dead for several generation does not apply for most of the cases. There are popular musician around the globe whose fame and real talent is actually assessed during his/her productive age and thus, eventually leave a lasting legacy in generations after their death.

The real talent of the any artists - be it musician, painter or any other art, is determined by the popularity of his/her art works. It is true in the field of music as music is the clear expression of the artists talent. This real talent of the musician can be deciphered by the listeners by listening to their piece of art. The name and fame of the musician is accordingly pervasive throughout the region and even his name and fame is revered by the peoples around the globe. One such example can be Michael Jackson - famously known as the King of Pop. No one can argue that the real talent that he possessed was not accurately deciphered during his productive age. He produced one after another scintillating piece of music which left the world in awe. His profound talent was revered throughout the globe and accordingly he was given the title of King of Pop.

Similarly, another one great musician of the contemporary era of Michael Jackson was Frederick Mercury - main vocalists of the famous band Queen. Frederick Mercury along with his band produced on of the best and iconic pieces of music and produce scintillating concerts throughout the globe. The people were right about the talent that he possessed from his early albums and after that he only has one way to look - forward. The Queen as a band left a lasting legacy there after and are still revered as one of the most iconic pop band ever to walk in this earth.

Moreover, coming to my country, the legacy of Narayan Gopal can never be left when it comes to analyzing the history of Nepali music. The legacy of Nararyan Gopal will last forever in our country as he is considered as the "Swar Samrat" of Nepali music history. His prodigious talent was also likewise clear form his early days and he produced one after another mesmerizing piece of music which left most of the music lovers of his time no option but to praise his talent.

However, one can easily be convinced to say that the early assessment of any musician cannot always depict the clear picture of his talent. But, who are bound to succeed and whose talent is so immense that one cannot ignore will certainly leave a lasting legacy, not merely during his time but in the generations that ensues. Coming to the conclusion, we can easily convince with these examples of the famous musician that the real talent of these musician was honestly assessed during their productive life and left a lasting impression after their death.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun generation seems to be countable; consider using: 'several generations'.
Suggestion: several generations
...assessed after the musician is dead for several generation does not apply for most of the cases. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'musicians'?
Suggestion: musicians
...or most of the cases. There are popular musician around the globe whose fame and real ta...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'artists'' or 'artist's'?
Suggestion: artists'; artist's
...as music is the clear expression of the artists talent. This real talent of the musicia...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 194, Rule ID: ON_OF_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one'?
Suggestion: one
...ck Mercury along with his band produced on of the best and iconic pieces of music ...
^^
Line 9, column 468, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: thereafter
...e Queen as a band left a lasting legacy there after and are still revered as one of the mos...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 443, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this musician' or 'these musicians'?
Suggestion: this musician; these musicians
...famous musician that the real talent of these musician was honestly assessed during their prod...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, but, honestly, however, if, likewise, look, moreover, similarly, so, still, thus, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2430.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 509.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77406679764 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46919393933 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.416502946955 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 785.7 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5451125254 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.45 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271152503156 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910999352704 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848863716743 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17439348597 0.150359130593 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105531465365 0.0667264976115 158% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.