The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Human brain has given rise to sophisticated technologies that has changed the face of whole planet. Things that were virtually unimaginable few centuries ago have become reality in this twenty-first century. It may be hard to digest that these innovations that are the brainchild of human would eventually outstrip humans themselves, but this fact has turned into reality.
Firstly, the machines that are invented by human are superior to them (human) because they have almost inexhaustible power and unimaginable accuracy. Human can perform certain work for certain period of time, but they grow tired physically and mentally after certain moment; there is limitation to what human beings can accomplish and how. However, machines work differently: they can work continuosly for a very long period of time with perfect accuracy. This is the major reason why most of the workers in factories, agriculture fields and industries are replaced by sophisticated machines at present.
Similarly, machines work without emotion that makes them able to outperform human in several field. Emotions are major obstacles to carry out any task; feeling of boredom, sadness or any other negative emotion brings down our passion to do works. But, machines work with equal energy at all times and that makes them able to out-perform human in any task. A self-driven car, for instance, can be programmed in such a way that it takes any judgment very meticulously, avoiding danger as much as possible. So, while driving if the steering is in control of AI, and if there is any danger ahead then it would take decision in such a way that there is least possible harm done. However, if the same steering is in the hand of human, he/she would take decision based on ones emotion- likely to be very erratic during such moment.
Now, the proponents of above argument might claim that human still have a strong hand on other important fields in which machines can never be able to be in par such as music, literature, arts e.t.c. But, we have several incidents where AI are being implemented to design buildings (a form of art), even compose music by blending different sounds, and how can we forget the ability of AI to mark the fallacy in our piece of writing.
So, although from bird’s-eye view it seems that we are in perfect control of our invention, a closer look can give us a vivid picture of how these invention are gaining ground in our daily lives. Nobody had thought while inventing tractor that this invention would drive a sway of unemployment among field workers but that has become reality now. The machines has put into peril the same human beings who invented it, and such dominance seen at present are still a tip of an iceberg.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...an can perform certain work for certain period of time, but they grow tired physically and men...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ey can work continuosly for a very long period of time with perfect accuracy. This is the majo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... at present. Similarly, machines work without emotion that makes them able to ...
^^
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun field seems to be countable; consider using: 'several fields'.
Suggestion: several fields
... makes them able to outperform human in several field. Emotions are major obstacles to carry ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 647, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the least'.
Suggestion: is the least
... take decision in such a way that there is least possible harm done. However, if the sam...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 147, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this invention' or 'these inventions'?
Suggestion: this invention; these inventions
...look can give us a vivid picture of how these invention are gaining ground in our daily lives. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 366, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...at has become reality now. The machines has put into peril the same human beings wh...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, similarly, so, still, then, while, for instance, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2273.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 462.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91991341991 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64171791891 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 724.5 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.4690575831 60.3974514979 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.705882353 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1764705882 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255787433455 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900119007505 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835361692295 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142990751086 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548747924855 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.