An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.
I wholly agree that an ailing patient should have access to his or her doctor's previous experiences with similar patients.
Firstly, A patient should be able to trust their doctor. Having to take treatment for any health issue can be a nerve-racking affair. To add to that, most patients have no clue about any scientific terms or medical jargon. Very often one does not even know what the medicine they are taking is supposed to treat. In such stressfull situations, it can be a huge relief to know that your doctor has treated someone who was in a similar condition before. This imformation helps the patient trust the doctors treatment wholeheartedly and allows him to focus on recovery.
Secondly, a patient knows what he is going through and his body the best. Any patient, who has been taking treatments from different doctors for a while or has been wanting to change doctors, will never know if the treatment being given to him is correct. If he could access his doctor's record of treating similar patients, he can be sure that the doctor knows how to deal with his problem. This would also allow patients to point out any similarities or differences they see with previous cases, and ask the doctor to adjust their treatment accordingly.
On the other hand, it is true that doctors who have studied and practised in their fields extensively for years have much more information and knowledge on a disease than a patient could have. It could be entirely possible that they know how to treat the patient without having a similar case before, or have previously worked under another doctor that has treated a similar patient. These would not go on the doctor's record, even they know how to deal with it. However, in such cases, it should be the patient's choice, whether he wants to be treated under the doctor.
Overall, I believe that having access to a doctors previous record builds confidence in the patient. Once a patient trusts his doctors expertise and the doctor knows the patient has no doubts or reservations about the treatment he is recieving, it makes the road to recovery smoother and stress-free for both the sides involved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...octors previous experiences with similar patients. Firstly, A patient should ...
^^
Line 3, column 498, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
...imformation helps the patient trust the doctors treatment wholeheartedly and allows him...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...om different doctors for a while or has been wanting to change doctors, will never know if t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 42, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a doctor' or simply 'doctors'?
Suggestion: a doctor; doctors
...verall, I believe that having access to a doctors previous record builds confidence in th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, no doubt, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 370.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83513513514 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55584950477 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4426675723 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.235294118 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7647058824 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 5.21951772744 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439271832977 0.243740707755 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166395666721 0.0831039109588 200% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967114004374 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300305441433 0.150359130593 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636404997333 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.