An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.
In modern society, Doctor's are of utmost importance like the immune system is in our body. The prompt recommends, A patient should have access to his or her doctor's record of treating previous cases of the same disease or ailment. In my opinion, I loosely agree with the prompt.
In some cases, there is a possiblity that patient shouldn't be allowed to view the doctor's history about a certain disease. For instance, take the example of Doctor's who have just completed their medschool and are now eligible and experience (under some senior doctor) for operating on a patient. Although, they have more than what is required for the job, a patient who is about to be treated will have no confidence in the doctor. Why? because there is no previous record of him operating independtly on a patient. In this case patient will never agree to treat himself or herself with that doctor eventhough he (doctor) is a trained professional.
On the contrary, a patient who has access to the doctor's previous history will be more calm and confident about the treatment. For instance, there is a case published in medical journal which shows patient given inert injection by an eminent doctor resulted in more relief in pain than who were given painkiller injections by nurse or amateur doctor's. The previous example shows how knowledge to doctor's background can alleviate the patients condition.
Furthermore, it is the patient's right to know if they are treated by the right person or not. Although, they would not have any medical understanding of the intricate treatments given by the doctor but they can judge by the end result of the treatment. After all they are the one spending their resources and trusting their life to get the best treatment possible.
In conclusion, there are cases and times when it is not possible or feasible to show the doctor's history of treatment in that particular disease. But it is best if patient have access to these records because they are the one's who are most affected by this decision and thus they should be the one with options to choose.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ses, there is a possiblity that patient shouldnt be allowed to view the doctors history ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
...patient shouldnt be allowed to view the doctors history about a certain disease. For in...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
... have no confidence in the doctor. Why? because there is no previous record of him oper...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... have no confidence in the doctor. Why? because there is no previous record of him oper...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'doctors'.
Suggestion: doctors
... herself with that doctor eventhough he doctor is a trained professional. On the co...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 90, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
...is not possible or feasible to show the doctors history of treatment in that particular...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 154, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...ment in that particular disease. But it is best if patient have access to these records...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, thus, after all, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, in some cases, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84269662921 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59723178166 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488764044944 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3774074073 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.75 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334902382208 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123752410426 0.0831039109588 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862130399876 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197543685662 0.150359130593 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674256071772 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.