An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.
As we know, the every doctor's first duty is to provide utmost care required by the ailing patient. So that the doctor must try provide much more attention to the patient till he or she gets cured. Even if there is no cure for any disease, the doctor must try to relieve the patient.
Therefore, I think the ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients, which may be affect the patient positively. So that he or she may not worried about getting cured. Let's say a patient got cataract. On the first, he or she might get worried. But, he or she gets to the doctor who has high experience in removing the cataract by operations. With the less number of failures in the operations. This may be affect the patient positively, so he or she may get less worried about the operation. Hence, it may be good that having easy access to his or her doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients.
Although this may affect negatively on the patient, if the doctor has some negative record. Let's say the same patient get to the different doctor with less number of successes on the record. Which may result in depressing the patient. Even he or she may feel that he or she should not get under operation. On the hand, the patient may even decide to change the doctor so that he or she may get better care in another location. So, the doctor's bad record may affect the patient negatively.
On the other hand, the doctor may have bad records on the earlier patients, but he may have good record for the later patients. This may be possible due to advancement in the operational instruments, which may reduce the difficulty in operations and increases the efficiency of the operating on patients. So that the doctor should have thorough records of treating similarly afflicted patients.
Therefore, we may conclude that the every patient should have easy access to his or her doctor's record of treating the similarly affected patients. And the record should thorough so that the patient better decide whether to get treated by the doctor or not.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...he may not worried about getting cured. Lets say a patient got cataract. On the firs...
^^^^
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...if the doctor has some negative record. Lets say the same patient get to the differe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...less number of successes on the record. Which may result in depressing the patient. E...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...fficiency of the operating on patients. So that the doctor should have thorough records...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'similarly', 'so', 'therefore', 'i think', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.194103194103 0.240241500013 81% => OK
Verbs: 0.149877149877 0.157235817809 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0737100737101 0.0880659088768 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0540540540541 0.0497285424764 109% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0663390663391 0.0444667217837 149% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.108108108108 0.12292977631 88% => OK
Participles: 0.039312039312 0.0406280797675 97% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.5071643145 2.79330140395 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.027027027027 0.030933414821 87% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.12285012285 0.0997080785238 123% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0589680589681 0.0249443105267 236% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.00737100737101 0.0148568991511 50% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2113.0 2732.02544248 77% => OK
No of words: 370.0 452.878318584 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71081081081 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.359459459459 0.366273622748 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.240540540541 0.280924506359 86% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.162162162162 0.200843997647 81% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.105405405405 0.132149295362 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5071643145 2.79330140395 90% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 219.290929204 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.381081081081 0.48968727796 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 39.1297979272 55.4138127331 71% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.8181818182 23.380412469 72% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9039928691 59.4972553346 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0454545455 141.124799967 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8181818182 23.380412469 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.454545454545 0.674092028746 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 40.8722358722 51.4728631049 79% => OK
Elegance: 1.26363636364 1.64882698954 77% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.509885541567 0.391690518653 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.163711618221 0.123202303941 133% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.10670106858 0.077325440228 138% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.587976400295 0.547984918172 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.170178120761 0.149214159877 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.227005724897 0.161403998019 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120025702323 0.0892212321368 135% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.519362089276 0.385218514788 135% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.097656357451 0.0692045440612 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.389188758073 0.275328986314 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823727180956 0.0653680567796 126% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.