All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time to listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary
Evaluation is necessary for each and every individual to know their current state of progress and efficiency. By properly evaluating one's work output, once can know the areas in which one needs to put more effort. The same is true for a smallscale business and even a multinational company. Any company needs an assiduous evaluation of their working efficiency so that they can find the high and the low points in their performance.
Many companies hire outside consultants to suggest amendments and modifications in the company's approach. This may be beneficial in a number of ways. Let us take the example of GRE itself. A student preparing for GRE will get an accurate delineation of where he/she stands by giving a preliminary test. Powerprep is one such platform for accomplishing this. The student can also take guidelines froman educated teacher or other students who have previously taken the GRE test to evaluate the performance and then suggest the necessary improvisations that are needed to be made. There are various professional consulting firms which provide such services to companies. The benefit from this type of consulting is that the company gets the guidance of an expert who has experience in this field.
While taking opinion from an outside consultant can prove beneficial in many ways, the company should not neglect the opinions of its own employees. After all, the employees know the best that in which areas the company is thriving and where it needs the most improvement. Again continuing with the GRE example, the testtaker can get a complete idea of his/her limitations only by introspecting and analyzing mistakes. Similarly, certain internal matters and problems can only be discerned by listening to the queries and sugegstions of the employees.
however, this process of consulting the employees can prove to be impractical for large scale multinational companies. While such companies do take care of employees' welfare. listening to the suggestions of each and every employee may be futile since there may be incongruence in their response.
Above all, a company can best estimate its efficiency by taking advice from both an outside consultant and from their own employees to get both- an expert opinion and an introspective opinion of their efficacy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...es and sugegstions of the employees. however, this process of consulting the employe...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...or large scale multinational companies. While such companies do take care of employee...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Listening
...nies do take care of employees welfare. listening to the suggestions of each and every em...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, similarly, so, then, while, after all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1932.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 370.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22162162162 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96111147276 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527027027027 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.8242458562 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05 5.21951772744 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294922379816 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892472083013 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777110816084 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165608384088 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340060091097 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.