All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their employees, such consultants would be unnecessary
Companies hiring consultants for their efficient working has become quotidian today. Many companies pay these consultants a large sum for their advice. I disagree from this cliché, that the company always needs to hire such consultants for methods to improve. Rather, they should introspect and spend time listening to way their earnest employees say. I believe going out of the house to resolve issues is not always necessary.
Firstly, employees can suggest a better way to make the company more efficient and effective at the same time. An employee of the company has profound knowledge about the company. He knows,how the company operates at the micro-level. He is cognizant of the way different employees around him carry their way,different areas where they are strong or weak. He might in a way, better know where actually the company falls right now. They might know the operations carried out by the company far better. Opinions from someone inside are always better.
Some might argue about this by saying that employees can have cupidity and can suggest things for their own benifits. So, I am not suggesting that the company should go around ask each and every employee about their suggestions. This might be impossible in big corporations. What the company needs are hand-ful of employees they can trust, who care about the company.If the company can trust outside consultants for help then, I don't think there should be trust issues with their best of employees, who work hard day and night for the growth of the company. Company's head can sit down with such shrewd hard-working employees and ask for their suggestions. They should take efforts to resolve the shortcomings within the company. Take for instance, in marriages, there might be issues between the two people, but what perfect couples do is work out andresolve the issues among themselves rather than going to law or an arbitror for solving disputes.
I believe that there can be need of outside consultants, only when the company is not getting soultion from it's employees. Only when there employees have hit a plateau that's when a different opinions of consultants might come in handy. Otherwise, there is no need to invest money in such consultants. Because the value of these consultants for the money paid to them is genarally not satisfing. The meticulous employees with integrity and probity are better options
- All students should be required to take at least one course in ethics even if taking the course means a decreased emphasis on academic subjects 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter the college 58
- Men and women based on their inherent physical differences are not equally suited to many tasks 50
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks 50
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
..., vague language and improper analysis. The premises based on which conclusion is m...
^^^
Line 2, column 147, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'mention'
Suggestion: mention
... due to cow flu. They argument does not mentions how many people can die because of cow ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d and inoculations are administered, we dont exactly know that the death of people i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e cases, to protect against cow flu? We dont know that. There is no mention regardin...
^^^^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , then
...d no possibility of people dying from it,then they should be administered without any...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...has no logical standing. Had there been more better analysis of how many people die because...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , inaccurate
...re sense. As of now due to various flaws,inaccurate analysis and assumptions in the argumen...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...sis and assumptions in the argument, it doesnt looks reasonable.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, regarding, second, so, then, for instance, as a result, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.6327345309 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 55.5748502994 106% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 2260.96107784 91% => OK
No of words: 419.0 441.139720559 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89260143198 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95057958369 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 204.123752495 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.403341288783 0.468620217663 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 664.2 705.55239521 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 19.7664670659 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.3068446623 57.8364921388 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4166666667 119.503703932 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4583333333 23.324526521 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29166666667 5.70786347227 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 17.0 6.88822355289 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410549487717 0.218282227539 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125734174234 0.0743258471296 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921864924698 0.0701772020484 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244803876 0.128457276422 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746491651124 0.0628817314937 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.3799401198 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.3550499002 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.5979740519 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.32208582834 83% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 98.500998004 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
..., vague language and improper analysis. The premises based on which conclusion is m...
^^^
Line 2, column 147, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'mention'
Suggestion: mention
... due to cow flu. They argument does not mentions how many people can die because of cow ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d and inoculations are administered, we dont exactly know that the death of people i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e cases, to protect against cow flu? We dont know that. There is no mention regardin...
^^^^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , then
...d no possibility of people dying from it,then they should be administered without any...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...has no logical standing. Had there been more better analysis of how many people die because...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , inaccurate
...re sense. As of now due to various flaws,inaccurate analysis and assumptions in the argumen...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...sis and assumptions in the argument, it doesnt looks reasonable.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, regarding, second, so, then, for instance, as a result, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.6327345309 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 55.5748502994 106% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 2260.96107784 91% => OK
No of words: 419.0 441.139720559 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89260143198 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95057958369 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 204.123752495 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.403341288783 0.468620217663 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 664.2 705.55239521 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 19.7664670659 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.3068446623 57.8364921388 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4166666667 119.503703932 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4583333333 23.324526521 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29166666667 5.70786347227 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 17.0 6.88822355289 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410549487717 0.218282227539 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125734174234 0.0743258471296 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921864924698 0.0701772020484 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244803876 0.128457276422 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746491651124 0.0628817314937 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.3799401198 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.3550499002 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.5979740519 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.32208582834 83% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 98.500998004 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.