A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter the college | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter the college.

What kids learn in their early age plays a vital role in what they do in their lives. Early learnings have a lot of impact in whether they are able to be successful or not. I disagree that the students should study the same national curriculum until they enter the college. Forcing all students to follow the same pattern may turn out to be a hard toil for some from a very young age. And there are chances if the kid doesn't do well he or she might lose his confidence from at a very early age.
Firstly, if a kid identifies at a very young age, he is particularly good at something, he should pursue it. The curriculum he choses should focus more on his skill, not only on academics. There should be a balance between academics and development of his personal skill. The curriculum should focus more on academics part for kids who are willing to pursue life based on their academics. On the contrary, kids willing to pursue something creative should not be forced to focus solely on academics, there the balance between academics and training for creative skills should tilt towards the latter. For instance, a person who wants to be an artist should not be forced to study tough integrations before he can actually foucs solely on arts when he enters the college life. Instead, he should be given training for development of his skill as an artist. Thus, if a kid trains at his skill from a very young age, would surely turn out to be extraordinary in future.
Furthermore, I believe in the old saying "each kid is different"; this indeed is true and we must treat each kid in a special different way. A national curriculum can be devised in a way such that different paths(of study) for students pursing different goals from a very young age. We can't treat a person who wants to do something creative, follow a different path, solely on his academic cgpa. Like, we can't judge a kid who wants to pursue singing based on his academic perfomance, what this does is makes that kid believe that he is inferior to others, because he is not scoring as good as the other kids who want to pursue their lives in academic/technical arena. Thus, each kid should be treated differently; giving promiment value to things they want to pursue. For instance, it's okay to grade a kid's capability based on academic performance if he wants to be say like a engineer/doctor(anything related to technical/academic arena) , but it's not okay to judge a kid who wants to pursue something creative in his life, something different only on the basis of his academic performance.
Finally, I am not suggesting that the curriculum should be entirely different for different groups of students; it just needs to be tilted a bit more towards the side the kid is interested in. I know, acamedics plays a prominent role in educating a person to be a respectful citizen, to be successful in life. So, we shold rather tilt in making it more interesting for different kids in different ways. Use it to produce a better individual, a better artist, a better engineer. This will help in kids becoming way more successful.
Thus, in my view, if the curriculum is same for all students it will prove benificial to some, but, on the other hand, will hinder the progress of lot.

Votes

Essay Categories

GMAT/GRE Issue Task

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 419, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...g age. And there are chances if the kid doesnt do well he or she might lose his confid...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 955, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...uld surely turn out to be extraordinary in future. Furthermore, I believe in the old say...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...fferent goals from a very young age. We cant treat a person who wants to do somethin...
^^^^
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
..., solely on his academic cgpa. Like, we cant judge a kid who wants to pursue singing...
^^^^
Line 3, column 790, Rule ID: IT_IS[8]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ings they want to pursue. For instance, its okay to grade a kids capability based o...
^^^
Line 3, column 810, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kids'' or 'kid's'?
Suggestion: kids'; kid's
...rsue. For instance, its okay to grade a kids capability based on academic performanc...
^^^^
Line 3, column 883, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... performance if he wants to be say like a engineer/doctoranything related to tech...
^
Line 3, column 944, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hing related to technical/academic arena , but its not okay to judge a kid who wan...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, well, for instance, in my view, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2675.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 576.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64409722222 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89897948557 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84678597421 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.427083333333 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 857.7 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9204134353 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.04 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175598160953 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675923735706 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121605339674 0.0758088955206 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115307361805 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755821352069 0.0667264976115 113% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, well, for instance, in my view, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments