All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their employees, such consultants would be unnecessary
Companies hiring consultants for their efficient working has become quotidian today. Many companies pay these consultants a large sum for their advice. I disagree from this cliché, that the company always needs to hire such consultants for methods to improve. Rather, they should introspect and spend time listening to way their earnest employees say. I believe going out of the house to resolve issues is not always necessary.
Firstly, employees can suggest a better way to make the company more efficient and effective at the same time. An employee of the company has profound knowledge about the company. He knows,how the company operates at the micro-level. He is cognizant of the way different employees around him carry their way,different areas where they are strong or weak. He might in a way, better know where actually the company falls right now. They might know the operations carried out by the company far better. Opinions from someone inside are always better.
Some might argue about this by saying that employees can have cupidity and can suggest things for their own benifits. So, I am not suggesting that the company should go around ask each and every employee about their suggestions. This might be impossible in big corporations. What the company needs are hand-ful of employees they can trust, who care about the company.If the company can trust outside consultants for help then, I don't think there should be trust issues with their best of employees, who work hard day and night for the growth of the company. Company's head can sit down with such shrewd hard-working employees and ask for their suggestions. They should take efforts to resolve the shortcomings within the company. Take for instance, in marriages, there might be issues between the two people, but what perfect couples do is work out andresolve the issues among themselves rather than going to law or an arbitror for solving disputes.
I believe that there can be need of outside consultants, only when the company is not getting soultion from it's employees. Only when there employees have hit a plateau that's when a different opinions of consultants might come in handy. Otherwise, there is no need to invest money in such consultants. Because the value of these consultants for the money paid to them is genarally not satisfing. The meticulous employees with integrity and probity are better options
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 188, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , how
...nd knowledge about the company. He knows,how the company operates at the micro-level...
^^^^
Line 2, column 307, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , different
...ent employees around him carry their way,different areas where they are strong or weak. He...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 355, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nt areas where they are strong or weak. He might in a way, better know where actua...
^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...y can trust, who care about the company.If the company can trust outside consultan...
^^
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...st outside consultants for help then, I dont think there should be trust issues with...
^^^^
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'trusted'?
Suggestion: trusted
...help then, I dont think there should be trust issues with their best of employees, wh...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 169, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...when there employees have hit a plateau thats when a different opinions of consultant...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 192, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'opinion'?
Suggestion: opinion
...ve hit a plateau thats when a different opinions of consultants might come in handy. Oth...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, if, so, then, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2005.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 395.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07594936709 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65137875933 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506329113924 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.9147270906 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5416666667 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4583333333 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415299086264 0.243740707755 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120435739624 0.0831039109588 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882362610247 0.0758088955206 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2612685904 0.150359130593 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874916185274 0.0667264976115 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.